I expect reference designs to help getting a system, subsystem or single chip up and running. They might spark my intuition but are not expected to do so.
The 'typical' design idea is less about the application of something given than about solving a problem with deficient means: working around lack of pins, stretching design limits, and so on. The design ideas I am perceiving are far beyond reference designs. AND: these DIs are the things sparking my imagination!
What could help in a limited number of applications (thinking of SMPS and high frequency designs) is what is given in the better reference designs: layout (hints) and tips on how to address "first order" problems.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.