Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Who knows?
Peter Clarke   7/16/2013 4:13:40 AM
NO RATINGS
@Rick


Signifies nothing?

Well, in the long term the issues of these companies may not amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world.

But in the medium-to-short term an Apple purchasing decision can make or break a supplying company which can in turn affect very many other component purchasers and shareholders.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Why GlobalFoundries Should Appeal to Apple
Peter Clarke   7/16/2013 4:00:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree that moving a particular complete IC design from one foundry to another is probably a thing of the past.

Also agree that IP blocks DO need to be moved. 

So the pathway may be to make Processor A in foundry X and Processor B in foundry Y.

Whether there needs to a foundry Z to make Processor C appears to be what Apple is juggling with.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Latest Rumour
Peter Clarke   7/16/2013 3:56:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Back in December 2012 Morris Chang was quoted as saying that his company is looking for a location for a wafer fab and that the US is one of the places under consideration.

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1262913

 

 

 

 

 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Who knows?
rick merritt   7/15/2013 7:41:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I would be surprised if someone responsible for foundry relations at Apple was NOT talking to GloFo and Intel as well as IBM, TSMC and Samsung.

But we will probably never know the story unless we find an Ed Snowden of Apple who will become instantly unemployable.

Who makes Apple's XYZ is an interresting soap opera--the Downton Abbey of electronics--but in the end methinks it signifies nothing.

 

 

JimMcGregor
User Rank
Author
Re: Why GlobalFoundries Should Appeal to Apple
JimMcGregor   7/15/2013 6:06:15 PM
NO RATINGS
There is a fourth option to consider that would also be interested in the funding: UMC.

While I agree that it makes sense for Apple to use multiple foundies, this can still be a challenge, not only because of differences in processes, but also cost. Using multiple fabs will require new mask sets for each fab, even if they are on the same or similar processes. Although Samsung and GF's processes are likley to be somewhat similar, the fab resources used by Samsung are not part of the Common Platform alliance. So, I doubt that it is the same process.  Also, Apple has already invested a significant amount into having dedicated resources at Samsung.

A few other items to consider are services, IP, and IP protection. Samsung and TSMC both offer more extensive services, IP, and IP protection than the other foundries, which are all considerations. In other words, switching from one fab to another is not like going to a grocery store across the street. It is a major engineering effort with a significant cost. As a result, any change takes time. In the end, I would expect to see two of the foundries, not more, manufacturing for Apple, and even then, they may be manufacturing different products.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
Re: Why GlobalFoundries Should Appeal to Apple
docdivakar   7/15/2013 4:46:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I think flashing $1 billion in front of GloFo at this juncture would be serious enough for it to give Apple a serious consideration BUT GloFo can do more outside of Apple's business. GloFo should certainly leverage its USA fab presence to its advantage while there is a trend toward more on-shoring.

While majority of the MEMS market is still dominated by players with the IDM-model, GloFo can leverage its experience with its MEMS fabs to advance the fabless model for MEMS.

MP Divakar

m00nshine
User Rank
Author
Re: Latest Rumour
m00nshine   7/15/2013 3:33:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Where is evidence of US fab plan for TSMC? As I know it was media speculation based on Chang comments only that he wouldn't rule it out as a possibility. This is not like any plan. Then later he was more firm and said basically TSMC would stay concentrated in Taiwan to make best utilization benefit.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Re: Latest Rumour
mcgrathdylan   7/15/2013 1:48:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree. The best thing for Apple would be to be able to use TSMC, Samsung and Globalfoundries. Then it could play them all against each other and wind up with the best deals.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Latest Rumour
Peter Clarke   7/15/2013 8:39:50 AM
NO RATINGS
The Korea Economic Daily sees it as Samsung winning business at the 14-nm FinFET node in 2015 after losing out to TSMC at 20-nm for 2014.

eewiz
User Rank
Author
Latest Rumour
eewiz   7/15/2013 8:33:40 AM
NO RATINGS
The latest rumour from Korea is that Apple is going to use Samsung Fab's again.

http://english.hankyung.com/news/apps/news.view?c1=&newscate=1&nkey=201307150718011

It makes sense for Apple to diversify the chip supply chain .

 

 



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...