Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
m00nshine
User Rank
Author
Supply competitions
m00nshine   7/15/2013 3:29:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I think unlikely for apple to move from one exclusive supplier to another. Good for everyone if 3-way competition Glo-Fo, Samsung, TSMC. TSMC almost too big to do an exclusive deal anyway without impacting other major customer. GF and Samsung also easy to move between for customer...any thoughts on capacity and utilization? I hear GF New York fab still not fully producing many years after building.

franzChen
User Rank
Author
Eggs in three baskets
franzChen   7/15/2013 4:02:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Putting eggs in three baskets. Good for barginning and lowering risks. Bad for the design team, as the suffering triples...

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Re: Supply competitions
mcgrathdylan   7/15/2013 4:12:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. Apple's best bet is to use them all and pit them against one another in competition. I believe many companies do this. But the thing I don't quite understand is: this is very complex technology. Can they all do it? Will all of the chips hit the same performance specs, regardless of who builds them?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Who knows
rick merritt   7/15/2013 4:50:15 PM
NO RATINGS
I take all these reports with a grain--a shaker--of salt.

Apple does not say where it makes its chips. Who knows how good 0or bad the sources of these reports are?

Apple and Samsung have perhaps the most complicated relationship in the whole technology sector. It's good theater, but at the end of the day, does it matter?

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Author
Re: Supply competitions
the_floating_ gate   7/15/2013 6:19:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Michael Campbell, a vice president of engineering in Qualcomm's chip design group, said FinFET structures in one foundry are "similar, but not the same" as those in another foundry. "You can only etch in certain directions and etch tools are common—that drives some similarities--but [foundries] use different in tricks in spatial walls and diffusion," he said.

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1263131


If indeed Apple split among three parties it would mean that none would get the 'critical mass" to eventually  ramp a 450mm fab or at least would make it a lot more difficult..


Besides all the ARM FinFets are 20nm backend with muted die shrink compared to 20nm planar - can't stress this enough as it was one of the reasons why ALTR switched to Intel.


Maybe Apple thinks it's smart to have them compete with each others to get a better price but in the longterm it could be bad for all three foundries


Tom Murphy
User Rank
Author
Re: Supply competitions
Tom Murphy   7/15/2013 6:52:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Dylan has good questions, but I have slightly different answers.  It makes sense for Apple to use different sources for chips - agreed. The reason to do that is, yes, heighten competition, but it also provides alternatives for the supply chain if one of the companies is disabled for some reason -- flood, earthquake, political upheaval, whatever.   Will all the chips work the same way?  Hopefully, they'll all support iOS the same way that AMD vs Intel support Windows -- not exactly the same, but close enough.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Re: Supply competitions
mcgrathdylan   7/15/2013 6:54:22 PM
NO RATINGS
@the_floating_ gate: Agree. Clearly it would be better for Samsung or TSMC if they had an exclusive deal with Apple. Competition means lower average price per wafer. But from Apple's perspective, you know that they want to have choices and price leverage.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Re: Who knows
mcgrathdylan   7/15/2013 6:57:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, your point is well taken. We do see these reports fairly frequently and at the end of the day, nobody outside of Apple or the foundries truly knows who is building the chips.

I also agree with you that the Apple-Samsung relationship is good theater. as for whether or not it matters, I for one would say yes. Samsung has been making great strides in increasing its foundry business, and Apple is obviously a major, major customer.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
Re: Apple, Samsung Reportedly Ink 14-nm Foundry Deal
docdivakar   7/15/2013 7:06:57 PM
NO RATINGS
There are some collateral benefits to both sides (Samsung & Apple) in doing business with each other. Each will be constantly gauging what the other is capable of so it keeps their teams on their toes.

Perhaps it is also the realization that fight between equals destroys both that leads them to cooperate and compete.

One would therefore hope that the deal betweent he two is beneficial to the end customer!

MP Divakar

bmccleanicinsights
User Rank
Author
Apple Samsung Relationship
bmccleanicinsights   7/15/2013 7:33:17 PM
NO RATINGS
It has long been IC Insights opinion that Apple will move away from using Samsung as a foundry but very very slowly.  It should be remembered that Samung has been a good supplier at the chip level to Apple—it has given Apple access to essentially all of the capacity it has needed, offers leading edge technology to Apple, and most likely provides Apple with good pricing (including bundling of processor, DRAM, and flash memory supply). The ability to supply Apple with processors, DRAM, and flash is one aspect of its association with Apple that just cannot be met by TSMC and GlobalFoundries.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...