Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
Re: Form v. Function
Frank Eory   7/18/2013 8:04:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Regarding tethered power, I think it will take quite a leap in energy storage technology before a machine like this could operate for any length of time without that tether.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Re: I would be more impressed..
mcgrathdylan   7/18/2013 7:43:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes Bert, of course. I was kind of being tongue and cheek there. I could swear I've seen a sci-fi movie where the robots had internal nuclear reactors that powered them. But I can't think of it and google has been no help. Maybe I made it up. In that case, maybe I should write the movie. :)

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Re: I would be more impressed..
Bert22306   7/18/2013 7:40:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Nuclear reactor? With anything approaching the current state of the art, that would be way too bulky for such a device, I think. Just the shielding required would make such a contraption impractical. Same with "atomic cars" that were predicted back in the 1950s. Not likely.

Something more along the lines of fuel cells, perhaps?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Re: I would be more impressed..
mcgrathdylan   7/18/2013 7:26:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree. If the think operated under its own power it would be much more impressive. But that would require some serious engineering and a lot of power, I imagine. I think in some sci-fi stories, robots like this are powered by their own internal nuclear reactor. That's another thing I would consider scary. Vey scary.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Re: Form Factor
Bert22306   7/18/2013 7:22:45 PM
NO RATINGS
For example, Tom, how easy would it be for a wheeled robot to climb a cliff or a climb a tree? Not likely. Or to swim?

Or put it another way. If you think of a propeller as being a wheel evolved for moving in water, then how effective would the propeller be on dry land?

Like anything else in engineering, designs are always a tradeoff. It seems to me that going for the humanoid, or mammal-like, or just large-animal-like, form factor, will most likely reap the best rewards in terms of flexibility of use.

sleibson-xilinx
User Rank
Author
Tom Swift had this 60 years ago
sleibson-xilinx   7/18/2013 7:20:53 PM
NO RATINGS
For exactly the same reasons: working in an atomic facility where humans couldn't go. Published in 1954:

 

http://www.tomswift.info/homepage/robot.html

 

--Steve

 

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Why arms and legs
Bert22306   7/18/2013 7:15:28 PM
NO RATINGS
"Doesn't it seem that a human form might not be the best one to rescue people? Why wouldn't it look more like a Mars rover? Two legs seem like a much weaker proposal than a half-man, half-tank version. What do you think?"

The proof is in the pudding. I think that nature did not evolve animals with forelegs and hindlegs for no good reason. These appendages seem to be far better at negotiating just about any type of terrain than are wheels or tank treads. Even if they are probably not the best for maximum speed (due to the needed reciprocating motion, which wastes energy at high rates of speed compared with wheels).

And it also seems that the larger animals do not have a huge number of appendages, as some insects do.

There's no doubt also the fact that man likes to create creatures in his own image, as many have stated, but I really think that ultimately there's a darned good reason why the larger land animals look like they (and we) do.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Author
Form Factor
Tom Murphy   7/18/2013 6:31:39 PM
NO RATINGS
I could see the robot being used to instill fear into an oncoming army  --- those little go-kart robots just look cute an unthreatening, which can be deceptive.  But I don't really get the humanoid form factor either.  We are not the most graceful critters on the planet, and I suspect a lower center of gravity along with a third leg or wheels would be beneficial.

studleylee
User Rank
Author
I would be more impressed..
studleylee   7/18/2013 4:48:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I would be more impressed if it wasn't tethered and under it's own power.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Author
Re: Washing Machine
Susan Rambo   7/18/2013 4:37:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with Caleb: these robot are learning tools, like concept cars. The engineers aren't thinking world domination yet. But then again, we do have drones flying around doing some serious damage to people. So some of scariest sci-fi nightmares are becoming reality. We wouldn't have those without engineers.

Someday all these robots in a museum. But in the meantime, I think they should strap the robot to a jet pack to test the jet pack for human use. But that's another discussion.

<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...