Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
mcgrathdylan   7/24/2013 7:47:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Any idea how popular this has been so far? How many basic kits people have already bought from him? It seems like Ryan has gone to quite a bit of work to advance his hobby. Seems like a labor of love.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
Tom Murphy   7/24/2013 1:03:58 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a great prototype for a stablization system for animation! I'm sure it could be productized and made into a profitable enterprise, perhaps using materials (metal or plastic) that would be a bit less clunky.  There are a lot of options to stabilize video and most cameras have some basic stablization built in; there are also good harnesses that strap onto the camera person, but I hadn't seen a system like this for animation before.  Surely, Lucas Arts has something like this in its shop. 

 

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
kfield   7/24/2013 11:54:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the insights Cab. I guess what I was really thinking about was now that he is going into version 2, there's likely to be feature additions and optimization of the existing design. It's always interesting to me to look at a design unfold over several iterations and get an understanding of the engineer's thought process throughout.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
Caleb Kraft   7/24/2013 11:43:56 AM
NO RATINGS
That $400 is the rough cost of the wood, motors, and control board. The software is free, and he's giving away his files for free right now.

You could estimate the additional cost for new features. Lets say you knew you wanted an arm with 2 axis control and a pan/tilt head on the end of it. You know you'll need 4 stepper motors and a wood frame. It isn't like a commercial system where you would also have an additional software module that would cost a small fortune. 

While this is awesome, it isn't a business model. He's not making kits as a job. I think he's just offering to help people continue his hobby. if 5,000 people wanted them from him, he'd have to rethink some things in order to be able to support them all. 

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
Re-engineering
kfield   7/24/2013 11:39:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Very cool project. I'd love to see you publish details on his next generation device and some of hte trade-offs and decisions he's making, particularly if he plans to keep the price point at around $400.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)