Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
narasimh
User Rank
Rookie
Comments : Let's Get System-Level Functional Verification Under Control
narasimh   2/6/2014 1:54:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Few comments:


1. Typically SoC platform from companies have derivative platforms with some features added or removed. There seems to be redundancies/duplication of efforts in functional verification in these kind of scenarious which is potential areas for savings.

2. Placing higher priority to VP platform for system level verification makes sense. Getting software run on VP without issues can ensure lot of success to business. Key reason being time to market. Software stack is critically tested on VP, and running on hardware ensures minimal software issues.

3 If the software use/test case can capture details of the the components, registers, memory sections... from the entire state space that are activated, one can gain higher level of confidence in verifcation.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: One Environment to Test Them All
Peter Clarke   7/25/2013 11:01:06 AM
NO RATINGS
As with many things there is a trade off.

You can verify fairly completely at a high-level of abstraction OR you can verify special corner cases in detail down to the metal.

But quite understandably in terms of the energy required no-one has found a way to verify completely, across the piece AND in detail.

So bugs can still creep through.

The challenge is where to put the effort in terms of improving the various forms of verification tool...virtual-prototype platform, RTL simulator and hardware-driven emulator.

Right now the empasis appears to be on the new kid on the block, virtual prototyping in sofware running on high-speed models.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SrivRagh
User Rank
Blogger
Re: One Environment to Test Them All
SrivRagh   7/25/2013 8:14:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Janine,
    I am assuming that you are referring to different simulation platforms (like virtual-prototype, RTL simulator or emulators like Palladium) when you use the word "environment". These platforms provide different levels of observability and simulation-performance (sim-performance) throughput. For example: RTL simulators give better observability but low sim-performance while emulators give marginal observability but deliver on sim-performance. Depending upon the verification stage, platforms are chosen, for example initially RTL simulator is chosen as the scenarios one would run are simple and the expectation is more bugs will be flushed out at this stage. But when confidence on RTL is built, folks take it to emulation or Sim-accelerators for stress testing and benchmarking.
Presently emulation vendors are improving observability and investing on transactional VIPs (partly synthesize-able) to re-use test-bench. My take, emulation platform may be the way to go but bottlenecks like compilation, cost etc will have to be addressed before it is adopted widely.


Thx
Srivats

JanineLove
User Rank
Blogger
One Environment to Test Them All
JanineLove   7/24/2013 2:54:36 PM
NO RATINGS
What are the stoppers/challenges for addressing structural, functional and performance issues in one environment?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).