Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
narasimh
User Rank
Author
Comments : Let's Get System-Level Functional Verification Under Control
narasimh   2/6/2014 1:54:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Few comments:


1. Typically SoC platform from companies have derivative platforms with some features added or removed. There seems to be redundancies/duplication of efforts in functional verification in these kind of scenarious which is potential areas for savings.

2. Placing higher priority to VP platform for system level verification makes sense. Getting software run on VP without issues can ensure lot of success to business. Key reason being time to market. Software stack is critically tested on VP, and running on hardware ensures minimal software issues.

3 If the software use/test case can capture details of the the components, registers, memory sections... from the entire state space that are activated, one can gain higher level of confidence in verifcation.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: One Environment to Test Them All
Peter Clarke   7/25/2013 11:01:06 AM
NO RATINGS
As with many things there is a trade off.

You can verify fairly completely at a high-level of abstraction OR you can verify special corner cases in detail down to the metal.

But quite understandably in terms of the energy required no-one has found a way to verify completely, across the piece AND in detail.

So bugs can still creep through.

The challenge is where to put the effort in terms of improving the various forms of verification tool...virtual-prototype platform, RTL simulator and hardware-driven emulator.

Right now the empasis appears to be on the new kid on the block, virtual prototyping in sofware running on high-speed models.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SrivRagh
User Rank
Author
Re: One Environment to Test Them All
SrivRagh   7/25/2013 8:14:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Janine,
    I am assuming that you are referring to different simulation platforms (like virtual-prototype, RTL simulator or emulators like Palladium) when you use the word "environment". These platforms provide different levels of observability and simulation-performance (sim-performance) throughput. For example: RTL simulators give better observability but low sim-performance while emulators give marginal observability but deliver on sim-performance. Depending upon the verification stage, platforms are chosen, for example initially RTL simulator is chosen as the scenarios one would run are simple and the expectation is more bugs will be flushed out at this stage. But when confidence on RTL is built, folks take it to emulation or Sim-accelerators for stress testing and benchmarking.
Presently emulation vendors are improving observability and investing on transactional VIPs (partly synthesize-able) to re-use test-bench. My take, emulation platform may be the way to go but bottlenecks like compilation, cost etc will have to be addressed before it is adopted widely.


Thx
Srivats

JanineLove
User Rank
Author
One Environment to Test Them All
JanineLove   7/24/2013 2:54:36 PM
NO RATINGS
What are the stoppers/challenges for addressing structural, functional and performance issues in one environment?



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...