Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>
User Rank
Re: It's in the discipline
junko.yoshida   7/29/2013 1:41:14 PM
I think the hacker mindset is already in most engineers. It just needs to be let loose. Corporate structure is more likely to be an inhibitor than is the engineering mindset.

Duane Benson, totally agreed.

Does anyone here work for a coporate environment in which you are encouraged to let your hair down and think like "attackers" in your engineering projects?   

Duane Benson
User Rank
It's in the discipline
Duane Benson   7/29/2013 1:29:50 PM
First, my pet peeve; re: "a hacker is someone who breaks into computer systems stealing information and doing other malicious stuff." That defines a criminal. A hacker may or may not be a criminal, as a doctor, lawyer or anyone may or may not be a criminal, but that definition is of a criminal.

Now to the questions at hand: "can engineers become hackers and hackers become engineers?"

I believe they can. In my mind, the mindset, thought processes and level of creativity are similar. Engineering, however, is supposed to follow a disciplined and calculated process, while hacking tend to take a more "I'm pretty sure" approach.

Most engineers I've met can skip the process and work on intuition if need be. I suspect it's a little more difficult for a hacker to move to engineering simply because It's almost always more difficult to transition from low discipline to high discipline.

In other words, I think the hacker mindset is already in most engineers. It just needs to be let loose. Corporate structure is more likely to be an inhibitor than is the engineering mindset.

User Rank
Re: Hacker can mean different things
junko.yoshida   7/29/2013 1:14:31 PM
Frank, you wrote:

For a long time, there have been engineering disciplines that requierd thinking like an attacker. Consider the fields of cryptography, signal jamming and anti-jamming systems and the general subject of electronic countermeasures.

Exactly. When the whole world of embedded systems becomes more vulnerable to potentials of external attacks (as more and more systems are designed to get connected to the internet), isn't it about time to have a special cource at an engineering school -- focused on "jpw to think like an attacker"?

If we can teach engineering, we should also be able to teach the art of hacking...

rick merritt
User Rank
Hackathons on the rise
rick merritt   7/29/2013 1:05:48 PM
Anyone rememeber Larry Lange? He was the first EE Times reporter to focus on covering Internet stuff. He interviewed Marc Andreessen in our offices before anyone understood what Netscape was doing.

Larry used to love the Black Hat event. He pointed out there are white and black hat hackers working for good and evil purposes.

Since then it has become clear to me there are grey areas too.

Add this to the mix: Hackathons are events where engineers design stuff. In this context hacking means quickly creating prototypes to test ideas out, bypassing what can be a slow design process at large established companies.

I covered two hackathons. One at Y Combinbator:


And one at Facebook's Open Compute Project event:


I think we ought to host a couple hackathons at Design West 2014. Anyone else interested?

User Rank
DU00000001   7/29/2013 10:08:36 AM
IMHO there is little that's differentiating hackers, crackers and engineers: the supposition of maliciousness does not necessarily apply only to one of the categories. (There's also the term of the "malicious engineer".)

On the other hand, one thing is common to all of them: to be superior, you have to apply analysis, a systematical approach, sometimes patience. Besides the 'brute force attack' all these methods describe engineers as well as the 'hackers'.

To be honest, from time to time I HAVE to hack something: to access information necessary but denied to me by to lack of documentation, cooperation, incompentence or sheer ignorance.

User Rank
Re: which hacker?
Patk0317   7/28/2013 7:00:54 PM
My one comment is that in the course of my studies I had to take class entitled "engineering ethics". I do not think hackers have taken this class. Having said that - yes you need to know your enemies better than you know your friends. In some sense ethics is a cultural issue and can be interpreted based on the culture you come from. Not making any judgements here - just an observation.

User Rank
same species/same mindset different vision
p_g   7/27/2013 7:30:40 PM
This is one of the most interesting article I have come across in EEtimes recently. thanks for posting it Junko.


I think Engg and hackers are same species with same mindset just different vision. I have seen engineer act like hackers. In one of a startup I do see when engineers were competing for resources and sys admin was weak they started to hack system to get thier job ahead in competition. I see tasks are like glass half full. Engg focus on half full part and hackers focus on half empty part. Engg try to get more water to fill it and hackers focus only on empty side of glass. I think they can be interchanged. The only thing  is engg tend to worry about legal Vs illegal aspect where hacker tend to ignore that part, infact they love being in illegal zone. If we make everything legal then every engg can act like hacker, given bth are asked to do same task.

User Rank
Many definitions of "hacker"
betajet   7/27/2013 4:46:28 PM
There are so many different definitions of "hacker" that IMO it's important to indicate which one you're using.  There are seven definitions at Wiktionary, four of them technological.  Wikipedia has three definitions, which I'll repeat here:

The first definition includes both "white hat" hackers like Robert Redford in Sneakers (1992) and "black hat" hackers AKA "crackers".  There's also the pejorative "hacker", meaning someone do does things haphazardly, like a "hack writer", or a programmer who hacks away at code until it works with a few test cases instead of doing a careful design.

So call me a "hacker" if you like, but please don't ever call me a "hacker" :-)

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Define "engineer"
Tom Murphy   7/27/2013 4:13:58 PM
Good questions, Junko, and I think Susan is right that there are many shades of meaning to the word (like the difference between analysis and blog in journalism).  But most of the hackers I know studied electrical engineering in school, work as engineers, and call themselves hackers.  If we're talking about cyber criminals or other malicious people, let's call them what they are.  And if a self-educated hacker gains enough knowledge to do some interesting things in code, is that not -- at some level -- engineering?

Do you have to have a degree in engineering to be an "engineer?" And must you lack such a degree to be a "hacker?"  What do others think about that...?

User Rank
Legal and ethical aspect
_hm   7/26/2013 8:41:48 PM
An engineer can work as hacker if work is legal and ethical. This is niche market and needs special skills and mindset.

Most engineers knowingly or unknowingly work as hacker in different capacity. It is good as technical challaenge and also good for earning money.

If it is legal and ethical, hacking is good fun.


<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

ESC Boston 2015 Sneak Peek! Embedded Systems That Glow in the Dark
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Some time ago, I asked my mom what she knew about radiation. She replied that she didn't know much about it at all; all she did know was that she didn't want to be in the same room as ...

Chris Wiltz, Managing Editor, Design News

10 Greatest Hoaxes in the History of Engineering
Chris Wiltz, Managing Editor, Design News
You'll probably be reading your fair share of fake headlines on April 1, but phony tech news - both for scams and humor - aren't anything new. The history of science and technology is rife ...

Bernard Cole

A Book For All Reasons
Bernard Cole
Robert Oshana's recent book "Software Engineering for Embedded Systems (Newnes/Elsevier)," written and edited with Mark Kraeling, is a 'book for all reasons.' At almost 1,200 pages, it ...

latest comment mjlinden Thanks for your input!
Martin Rowe

Leonard Nimoy, We'll Miss you
Martin Rowe
Like many of you, I was saddened to hear the news of Leonard Nimoy's death. His Star Trek character Mr. Spock was an inspiration to many of us who entered technical fields.

Special Video Section
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Flash Poll