Breaking News
Comments
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Nvidia's retort
rick merritt   7/31/2013 10:22:52 AM
NO RATINGS
In the past, Nvidia defended itself saying Qcomm did not get significant performance benefits from the work of doing a custom core design (less than a 15% boost they claimed). They also argued ARM is putting out so many cores and interconnects so fast these days there's no real time to market advantage doing it yourself either.

Applied Micro may find the latter point is true by the time it gets out its 64-bit server SoCs.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Nvidia's retort
Peter Clarke   7/31/2013 10:36:48 AM
NO RATINGS
yes but is that betraying an emphasis on computational performance.

ARM maybe putting out lots of cores and POPs but maybe 15 percent better power efficiency justifies going custom?

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Nvidia's retort
Tom Murphy   7/31/2013 10:51:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Rick and Peter raise an interested question:  just what is the tipping point between real performance increase and the cost of going custom?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Nvidia's retort
mcgrathdylan   7/31/2013 2:11:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I understand what Nvidia is saying, and I would agree that with ARM putting out so many cores the advantage of doing a custom core design would seem limited. But I also agree with Peter. 15 percent is something. That probably makes it worthwhile for Qualcomm.

DF0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Nvidia's retort
DF0   8/1/2013 1:04:57 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the big thing that got a lot of the mobile SoC guys was that the A15, while fast, used too much power, and the A9 was getting outdated.  It looks like the A12 will fill this gap, but it's not going to be available for awhile.

DF0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Nvidia's retort
DF0   8/1/2013 1:03:12 PM
NO RATINGS
True, but NVIDIA is developing their own ARM cores as part of their Project Denver.  Also, the Tegra 4i uses a modified A9, called A9R4.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Nvidia's retort
Peter Clarke   8/1/2013 1:23:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe A9R4 is just a standard updating revision of A9

All the Cortex-A series cores undergo continual revision and debug

 

The latest version for Cortex-A9 is r4p1

The latest version for Cortex-A15 is r4p0

 

 

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Nvidia's retort
Wilco1   8/2/2013 9:12:27 AM
NO RATINGS
A9R4 is a lot more than a simple bug revision - unlike most revisions it improves performance significantly due to a new branch predictor and a new prefetcher. The IPC gain coupled with the frequency boost means the gap with A12/A15 is now fairly small.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Nvidia's retort
Peter Clarke   8/2/2013 10:30:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the input.

 

Peter

DF0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Nvidia's retort
DF0   8/1/2013 1:08:14 PM
NO RATINGS
A big benefit for Qualcomm was that, by developing their own core, they could provide something faster-than-A9 before everyone else, who were still waiting for the A15.

The MicroMan
User Rank
Rookie
An expensive 15%
The MicroMan   8/1/2013 1:33:11 PM
NO RATINGS
There are so many things that make a successful processor chip.  Power consumption is critical, but selling the chip into a outrageously successful end product is the most important.  Maybe 10-20% more battery life makes a modest product an outrageous product, but probably not.  But the cost of manning your own design team to squeeze out less current, then possibly ongoing software differences, could also kill the financials if the end product doesn't hit volume.  Since Samsung sells the end product (smart phone) it *should* know it's customer the best and have a better confidence in whether those volumes will come.  Not for the faint of heart.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: An expensive 15%
Tom Murphy   8/1/2013 1:57:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said, MicroMan. I think in any industry, the creative types -- quite appropriately -- aren't really focused on costs of their endeavors, just on end results.  Upper management earns the big money for making those calls on the risk/return ratios, which sometimes seem incredibly insightful or hopelessly stupid to the rest of us after the results start flowing in. We often see a CEO fired after a product fizzles; it's their job to get it right.    So here's a rare moment of praise for the CFO and CEO who have the guts to say: "Yeah, go ahead, spend the money. What you guys are working on could be a winner for us."

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: An expensive 15%
Peter Clarke   8/2/2013 6:06:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung is also in the position of already having gained market share for its Galaxy smartphones using a licensed ARM core approach while being able to compare its position against Qualcomm Snapdragon (which it uses) and Apple A series processors (which it doesnt).

 

 



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
8 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)