Hi Sanjib.A, you pose several questions and I'll answer the best I can. As I'm not completely familiar with GTEMs, except from what I've read, you may need to consult other experts in the field.
I believe there is a "best" lower limit with GTEMS, depending on their size. So assuming the product you're testing does not exceed the size recommendation and the frequencies in question are - say - above 150 MHz, I've read they can be accurate enough for pre-compliance testing. Please correct me if I'm wrong...
As for your second question, there are "sources" of RF energy, such as devices producing fast edges (oscillators, buffers, ASICs, A/D, D/A, etc.) and these sources can couple via conductive, radiative, inductive or capacitive means to "radiating structures", such as cables, enclosure seams, etc.
Typically, it is common-mode currents that radiate via these radiating structures. As long as the loop area between the differential mode source and return currents is small, then DM emissions is usually a second-order effect.
A horizontal emission might come from a horizontal cable or a vertical seam, and visa versa with vertical emissions. You can also have a combination of the two.
I missed the webinar, but thanks for sharing the link and Q&A. I have the following questions for which I have not got satisfactory answers:
1. Is it okay to use a GTEM cell to do the pre-compliance testing? I saw a big difference in the results when we tried to fix a power supply issue in GTEM cell vs when we tried the same fix in an anechoic chamber. Would you suggest avoiding GTEM cell for pre-compliance testing?
2. How to interpret about the source of the noise (PCB or Cable; Common-mode or diff mode) if a frequency component is appears in Horizontal scan but not in the vertical scan or vice-versa or appears in both?
Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.