Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: 3D NAND Delay?
resistion   4/20/2014 8:28:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Samsung seems to have already made a statement 2/17 that they are working on 32 layers (at once I presume), but they have no issues with 24 layers. Indeed, they need to be able to do 32 or more layers at once if possible, to keep the scalability advantage.

http://m.hankyung.com/apps/english.view?aid=201402172111041

resistion
User Rank
Author
Delay?
resistion   4/19/2014 8:55:33 PM
NO RATINGS
chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
Re: Stacked 3d package for stacked NAND chips
chipmonk0   8/8/2013 11:33:10 AM
NO RATINGS
@Peter Clarke : Thx in advance.

pseudoid
User Rank
Author
Baby Steps
pseudoid   8/7/2013 3:43:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Our industry needs to continue with attempts to never make our esteemed colleague Gordon E. More wrong! 

I know we are getting there in small baby steps, including the eventuality of 3D fab. 

At the current time, the bottleneck appears to be with the copper interconnects (physical throughput speed limit).  I can't wait for the day when finally Samsung and Intel cross paths at match.com and start courting each other.  "Hello 3D NAND! Please meet Silicon Photonic ICs." ;)

"We have been developing process technology to create a monolithic, photonic sub-system. We build these just like you build any other kind of IC, in a standard chip factory," states Intel's Rattner

Pasted from <http://www.electronicsnews.com.au/features/what-bottleneck-silicon-photonics-technology-boost>

krisi
User Rank
Author
how many electrons?
krisi   8/7/2013 3:23:09 PM
NO RATINGS
The article states that the new memory cell relies of electron trapping. So how many electrons are trapped to store 1? Can anyone offer an educated guess? Kris

any1
User Rank
Author
Re: 2 Questions
any1   8/7/2013 1:41:23 PM
NO RATINGS
This is an interesting development. I think it is likely that Samsung knows, along with every other major player in the memory business, that 3D NAND is just a question of when not if.  Then, it may make sense to get some early learning on volume manufacturing of this technology a node or two ahead of when you think you will actually need it.  You can do all of the modeling of cost, device physics, processing, etc.  But until you actually do it on a higher volume basis you really don't know what you don't know.

So I would call 3D NAND a "More than Moore" approach since the minimum feature size is actually getting larger.  It only makes sense if it produces a better device at a lower cost than the 2D equivalent.  And this remains to be determined.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Stacked 3d package for stacked NAND chips
Peter Clarke   8/7/2013 1:39:45 PM
NO RATINGS
I'll ask Samsung

 

 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: 2 Questions
Peter Clarke   8/7/2013 1:38:52 PM
NO RATINGS
1) 1 byte = 8 bits so, yes, 128-Gbit = 16-Gbyte

It ihas been the convention within the semiconductor industry to quote memory capacity in bits. But either bits or bytes will do.

2) By which i mean planar scaling has become moot with regards to scaling memory capacity

 

 

 

pseudoid
User Rank
Author
2 Questions
pseudoid   8/7/2013 12:46:18 PM
NO RATINGS
1)  I am slightly confused about the wordage "128 Gbit V-NAND" CTF:  Would that be the equivalent of 16GByte memory, or is this going to be a new unit of measure?

2) Does this news also mean that "Moore's Law" has been removed from its premature life support systems?

chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
Stacked 3d package for stacked NAND chips
chipmonk0   8/7/2013 12:31:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Read in a blog somewhere that Samsung is going to sell their 3d NAND in a 128 GB configuration by stacking 8 chips vertically and connecting them with TSVs ( Through Silicon Vias ). Can Peter Clarke or anyone else comment on this ?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
TFCSD
 
TFCSD
 
TFCSD
 
resistion
 
Tim R Johnson
 
resistion
 
docdivakar
 
David Ashton
 
TechRoadRash
Most Recent Messages
2/13/2016
10:42:58 PM
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...