All indications are that team sizes are growing for the most complex designs. The number of verification engineers per team is growing and additional tools are necessary for the back end physical design and verification. However, while this points to revenue increases, there is also commoditization going on with the older generations of tools meaning that prices for those is in decline. So, EDA revenues, which includes IP remains fairly constant at 2% of semiconductor revenues. It is not clear to me if this continues to hold in the future.
"services revenue rose 23.8 percent to $101.9 million...Services growth usually indicates increased demand among semiconductor companies for design work than they can fulfill using their own employees. This is a leading indicator that the semiconductor market is improving and that, in a slightly longer timeframe, EDA will continue to improve, because extra employees will eventually need more tools."
Do you think some of the efficiencies, co-design options, and other improvements from EDA vendors will have an impact on how much more growth (e.g more employees) companies will need?
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.