Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
CEO
vertical NAND string
resistion   9/11/2013 12:27:02 AM
NO RATINGS
If it exceeds 64 layers, that would be a longer than standard string length that degrades performance. So not much leg here.

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
double-o-nothing   8/21/2013 9:36:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Etching 24 pairs of alternating layers without deposition would be sufficient for pitch/24, in alternate spacer schemes.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
resistion   8/21/2013 10:03:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for pursuing the details. But for sure each of the 24 layers has its own iteration of mask redeposition (to prevent hole widening), nitride etch, and oxide etch. If applied to spacer pitch division, the pitch would have been divided by 2^24, or almost 17 million, yet for 24 layer 3D NAND, it's only effectively divided by about 5. That's the cost efficiency gap.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
resistion   8/21/2013 3:16:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Not so sure about that. Check the narrowest line positions has some discontinuity. But need a better view to confirm.

soqeh
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
soqeh   8/21/2013 2:08:47 AM
NO RATINGS
resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
resistion   8/20/2013 9:18:11 PM
NO RATINGS
@rage33: it's a good consideration. Although in the TCAT the gate dielectric layers are wrapped around the gate, it may not be simple alternating of two layers.

There was a followup statement by Samsung which confirmed they were using MLC, but the 24 layers probably should be taken to mean device layers. Because in the statement they emphasized the desire to go beyond the 10 nm equivalent density. This would be possible with both MLC and 24 device layers.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/19/samsung_launches_damp_3d_ssd_squib/

But they achieve this goal at very high cost. It appears necessary they need to do at least one process sequence iteration. Thus it is targeted for enterprise rather than consumer.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/08/13/samsung-unveils-first-ssds-with-3d-v-nand-memory/

The latter announcement at engadget also confirms the 24 layers as device layers.

rage33
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
rage33   8/15/2013 1:38:39 PM
NO RATINGS
They also said 24 layers, not 24 storage layers.  This could mean that memory storage is only 12 layers with passivating layers between.  They could be counting all the layers to total the 24.  

I think we can also assume this is MLC.  They claimed 35k write cycles on this and how it had 2-10X better reliability than existing NAND.  Assuming this is in reference to cycling, SLC can already exceed 35k cycles.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
resistion   8/15/2013 10:51:58 AM
NO RATINGS
That's a good point. Microloading or insufficient resist thickness can limit the etch depth, and therefore the number of layers. But iterating cannot reduce the cost per bit.

 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3D NAND requires more than double patterning
Peter Clarke   8/15/2013 8:07:23 AM
NO RATINGS
I doubt they are patterning the layers in one shot.

I am sure it is an interative process building up the layers

And then punch through with connecting via.

So I think you are right if you are implying much longer dwell-time on the exposure and etch machines to end up with 24 layers but only the same memory capacity.

But the masks are cheaper in older technology...and in theory this may scale to say 96 layers providing a memory density otherwise unachievable.

 

 

 

 

 

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
3D NAND requires more than double patterning
double-o-nothing   8/15/2013 1:12:13 AM
NO RATINGS
There is some extra cost for requiring double patterning even at the looser design rule. And there are many layers to be deposited and etched which in total far exceed the material consumption by quadruple patterning. I think all that is reduced dramatically is exposure cost but they're adding new layers and are they really patterning all the 24 layers in one shot (how thick photoresist?).

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
23 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).