Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Re: Good to be a product based company
Peter Clarke   8/27/2013 6:35:08 AM
I agree it is good to be product-based company. It certainly scales better than a service-based company.

However, one distinction that my Rambus interviewee was making, I believe, was between being a technology licensor (that teaches customers how to fish) rather than a patent licensee (that warns people that if they are thinking about designing a fishing rod they have to pay up). 

User Rank
Good to be a product based company
Sanjib.A   8/20/2013 1:12:18 PM
I too believe it is always good to be a product based company rather than doing just IP licensing if the product is right for the market. Again it is encouraging to see that RamBus is working on some product capable of IoT. This trend emphasizes that IoT is on the horizon, even though there are some speculations raised about its success in the article "Internet of Things need glue".

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Re: happy to hear
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:19:44 AM
Rambus has signed some very big deals and achieved some very big settlements over the years.

In general it's patent licensing play would seem to have been successful BUT it is hard to build a relationship with customers through the confrontational legal system AND such settlements are "lumpy" which can be frightening for shareholders.

I think Ron Black has decided that it is better to be collaborative and take a little bit less out of the customers at each licensing bite but win repeat business, just like ARM.

But he also has to decide in which markets to play as a product or service provider and in which markets to be an IP licensor. You can't do both in the same market at risk of competing with your customers.



Peter Clarke
User Rank
Re: Which "products"?
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:10:26 AM


I think you are right.

It may well be that Rambus will be looking for some strategic options for some of its technologies while looking for others that hang together well.

For example, I can imagine a synergy between memory interfaces, cryptographic protection, digital rights management and image computation. Light bulbs and displays seem to be in a different camp.

User Rank
Which "products"?
junko.yoshida   8/12/2013 10:54:16 PM
Rambus' plan to diversify its business beyond memory technology has been put in place since more than a few yearsa ago.

First, it started with lighting and display technology (see details below)


and then, Cryptography Research Inc. was also added a couple of years ago.

Now, image sensors, etc.

It is not clear to me that with such diversified technology fields Rambus seems interested in today, which ones will become Rambus' flagship products vs IP licesning.


User Rank
Re: good move?
daleste   8/12/2013 9:57:11 PM
Yes, I agree.  Having products to sell is always a better position than licensing IP.  You don't need as many lawyers.

User Rank
Re: Rambus Focuses on Products, Not Patents
docdivakar   8/12/2013 4:41:23 PM
Good move indeed. How ever, emulating an ARM-like business model will take changes to both R&D and marketing for Rambus. Licensing patents vs. Silicon-verified IP does take more R&D investment for the latter.

MP Divakar

User Rank
good move?
krisi   8/12/2013 2:51:52 PM
Whether that is actaully good move financially that remains to be seen...but at least this is a good move for my engineering soul ;-)

User Rank
Re: happy to hear
Sheetal.Pandey   8/12/2013 2:42:45 PM
Thats a good move by RAMBUS. Patent game is a distraous game unless your pockets are deep and you have the right lawyers.

rick merritt
User Rank
Perception and reality
rick merritt   8/12/2013 2:38:15 PM
Interesting neew direction.

At a recent meeting lunch meeting of licensing executives in Silicon Valley, Rambus was listed as one of the top five non-practicing entities by revenue, so they are definitely seen as a patent, not a product company.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>

IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.