Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good to be a product based company
Peter Clarke   8/27/2013 6:35:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree it is good to be product-based company. It certainly scales better than a service-based company.

However, one distinction that my Rambus interviewee was making, I believe, was between being a technology licensor (that teaches customers how to fish) rather than a patent licensee (that warns people that if they are thinking about designing a fishing rod they have to pay up). 

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
Good to be a product based company
Sanjib.A   8/20/2013 1:12:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I too believe it is always good to be a product based company rather than doing just IP licensing if the product is right for the market. Again it is encouraging to see that RamBus is working on some product capable of IoT. This trend emphasizes that IoT is on the horizon, even though there are some speculations raised about its success in the article "Internet of Things need glue".

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: happy to hear
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:19:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Rambus has signed some very big deals and achieved some very big settlements over the years.

In general it's patent licensing play would seem to have been successful BUT it is hard to build a relationship with customers through the confrontational legal system AND such settlements are "lumpy" which can be frightening for shareholders.

I think Ron Black has decided that it is better to be collaborative and take a little bit less out of the customers at each licensing bite but win repeat business, just like ARM.

But he also has to decide in which markets to play as a product or service provider and in which markets to be an IP licensor. You can't do both in the same market at risk of competing with your customers.

 

 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Which "products"?
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:10:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Junko

 

I think you are right.

It may well be that Rambus will be looking for some strategic options for some of its technologies while looking for others that hang together well.

For example, I can imagine a synergy between memory interfaces, cryptographic protection, digital rights management and image computation. Light bulbs and displays seem to be in a different camp.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Which "products"?
junko.yoshida   8/12/2013 10:54:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Rambus' plan to diversify its business beyond memory technology has been put in place since more than a few yearsa ago.

First, it started with lighting and display technology (see details below)

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1264103

and then, Cryptography Research Inc. was also added a couple of years ago.



Now, image sensors, etc.

It is not clear to me that with such diversified technology fields Rambus seems interested in today, which ones will become Rambus' flagship products vs IP licesning.

 

daleste
User Rank
CEO
Re: good move?
daleste   8/12/2013 9:57:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I agree.  Having products to sell is always a better position than licensing IP.  You don't need as many lawyers.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Rambus Focuses on Products, Not Patents
docdivakar   8/12/2013 4:41:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Good move indeed. How ever, emulating an ARM-like business model will take changes to both R&D and marketing for Rambus. Licensing patents vs. Silicon-verified IP does take more R&D investment for the latter.

MP Divakar

krisi
User Rank
CEO
good move?
krisi   8/12/2013 2:51:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Whether that is actaully good move financially that remains to be seen...but at least this is a good move for my engineering soul ;-)

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: happy to hear
Sheetal.Pandey   8/12/2013 2:42:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Thats a good move by RAMBUS. Patent game is a distraous game unless your pockets are deep and you have the right lawyers.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Perception and reality
rick merritt   8/12/2013 2:38:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting neew direction.

At a recent meeting lunch meeting of licensing executives in Silicon Valley, Rambus was listed as one of the top five non-practicing entities by revenue, so they are definitely seen as a patent, not a product company.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Are Today's Designs Bound by the Constraints of Yesteryear?
Max Maxfield
25 comments
As part of my ongoing Pedagogical and Phantasmagorical Inamorata Prognostication Engine project (try saying that 10 times quickly), I'm working with Jason Dueck from Instrument Meter ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...