Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
Encouraging
mcgrathdylan   8/12/2013 1:59:28 PM
NO RATINGS
It's encouraging to read this. I think focusing on products rather than pursuing a strategy that has Rambus labeled as a "patent troll" is a good direction for the company. I like the statement that there is not much difference between Rambus and ARM. Years ago I think that was true, but in recent years the companies seem to have pursued very different paths. I hope this is a sign that Rambus will indeed be more like ARM as time goes on.

krisi
User Rank
Author
happy to hear
krisi   8/12/2013 2:09:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I am really happy to hear that...so many companies are trying to derive value from licensing that is somnewhat refreshing that someone actually wants to build products...good luck Rambus!

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Perception and reality
rick merritt   8/12/2013 2:38:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting neew direction.

At a recent meeting lunch meeting of licensing executives in Silicon Valley, Rambus was listed as one of the top five non-practicing entities by revenue, so they are definitely seen as a patent, not a product company.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: happy to hear
Sheetal.Pandey   8/12/2013 2:42:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Thats a good move by RAMBUS. Patent game is a distraous game unless your pockets are deep and you have the right lawyers.

krisi
User Rank
Author
good move?
krisi   8/12/2013 2:51:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Whether that is actaully good move financially that remains to be seen...but at least this is a good move for my engineering soul ;-)

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
Re: Rambus Focuses on Products, Not Patents
docdivakar   8/12/2013 4:41:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Good move indeed. How ever, emulating an ARM-like business model will take changes to both R&D and marketing for Rambus. Licensing patents vs. Silicon-verified IP does take more R&D investment for the latter.

MP Divakar

daleste
User Rank
Author
Re: good move?
daleste   8/12/2013 9:57:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I agree.  Having products to sell is always a better position than licensing IP.  You don't need as many lawyers.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Which "products"?
junko.yoshida   8/12/2013 10:54:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Rambus' plan to diversify its business beyond memory technology has been put in place since more than a few yearsa ago.

First, it started with lighting and display technology (see details below)

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1264103

and then, Cryptography Research Inc. was also added a couple of years ago.



Now, image sensors, etc.

It is not clear to me that with such diversified technology fields Rambus seems interested in today, which ones will become Rambus' flagship products vs IP licesning.

 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Which "products"?
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:10:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Junko

 

I think you are right.

It may well be that Rambus will be looking for some strategic options for some of its technologies while looking for others that hang together well.

For example, I can imagine a synergy between memory interfaces, cryptographic protection, digital rights management and image computation. Light bulbs and displays seem to be in a different camp.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: happy to hear
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:19:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Rambus has signed some very big deals and achieved some very big settlements over the years.

In general it's patent licensing play would seem to have been successful BUT it is hard to build a relationship with customers through the confrontational legal system AND such settlements are "lumpy" which can be frightening for shareholders.

I think Ron Black has decided that it is better to be collaborative and take a little bit less out of the customers at each licensing bite but win repeat business, just like ARM.

But he also has to decide in which markets to play as a product or service provider and in which markets to be an IP licensor. You can't do both in the same market at risk of competing with your customers.

 

 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...