Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Robot Certification...
R_Colin_Johnson   8/14/2013 2:55:18 PM
NO RATINGS
You may be right that training should not be necessary. In fact, one trend to take robots mainstream is called "co-robots"--which are supposed to accept instruction from an untrained human who just demonstrates the task while the robot watches. That is one goal, at least, of Obama's National Robotics Initiative:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/08/03/supporting-president-s-national-robotics-initiative

 


Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: Sensitivity?
Sheetal.Pandey   8/14/2013 2:10:45 PM
NO RATINGS
The only thing that differentiate a human from robot is feeling and emotions. If robots can get that, we are making close to humans, but yes the the way robot would behave must be already programmed. Although humans may behave differently in same situations.

Looking at how robots are being visualized and used in many different applications, it is worthwhile to have them feel.

richbham
User Rank
Rookie
Zhong video
richbham   8/14/2013 1:35:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Zhong Lin Wang explains piezo-phototronics in this SPIE video: http://spie.org/x51504.xml

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Robot Certification...
Duane Benson   8/14/2013 1:23:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think we'll be able to consider robots to truly be mainstream until they're easy enough to use without a training class. It really needs to be an appliance.

Of course, computers are mainstream and are still challenging enough to a lot of people that training classes would be a big help. But the number of people who operate them without training would indicate that most people would not bother with training for a robot. I think the only reason people get training in cars before getting a license is because the government requires it.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sensitivity?
R_Colin_Johnson   8/14/2013 12:24:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Right on, Larry. Sensitivity already rivals humans and is only getting better. You are also spot-on regarding applications--robots is just a headline grabber, but any touch enabled application today is a candidate.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Robot Certification...
R_Colin_Johnson   8/14/2013 12:19:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, there will definitely need to be user training classes included with general purpose robots, but we will probably see turnkey special purpose robots long before that (like a "cooking" robot whose arms extend from the top of your stove) where just pushing a few buttons will control its behaviors.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: Sensitivity?
LarryM99   8/14/2013 12:18:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm no expert on the biology, but 6,300 dpi and 90 millisec are far beyond the specs that I would expect to see if they did the same tests on me. On the other hand, maybe I'm just insensitive and a little on the slow side... :-)

It seems like this could also go beyond robotics. There are other places where a touch-sensitive surface can be used for input. A touchpad for a laptop that could distinguish a user by fingerprints, for example.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Robot Certification...
R_Colin_Johnson   8/14/2013 12:16:33 PM
NO RATINGS
All of the current robot makers have training programs for operators, although most don't call it certification (for instance, DaVinci surgical robots go to lengths to say its not certification--but I think that is to deflect lawsuits :)

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sensitivity?
R_Colin_Johnson   8/14/2013 12:07:30 PM
NO RATINGS
The authors claim their prototype offers sensitivity "comparable" to humans plus that next they are improving them by growing even smaller nanowires. However, the big boon for robotics will be their ability to assemble things they can't today. In particular, robots are not good at putting in screws, because their fingers cannot sense when the threads are properly lined up. Robotic skin with built-in touch sensors like these could solve that problem.

JanineLove
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sensitivity?
JanineLove   8/14/2013 10:47:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Not being a specialist in biology, I'm curious about how these specs stack up to human sensitivity: "Wang's team grew 2.7 micron diameter zinc-oxide nanowires into arrays that were able to sense touch with a resolution of 6,300 dots per inch and a switching time of 90 milliseconds." Anyone?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Are Today's Designs Bound by the Constraints of Yesteryear?
Max Maxfield
26 comments
As part of my ongoing Pedagogical and Phantasmagorical Inamorata Prognostication Engine project (try saying that 10 times quickly), I'm working with Jason Dueck from Instrument Meter ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...