Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   8/17/2013 4:02:45 AM
NO RATINGS
In my opinion also ,just the over-provisioning will not solve the latency problem of Ethernet. So CAN kind of network will still be required for critical systems such as ECU, ABS...  A good combination of CAN and Ethernet could be a median solution.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Speed also solves latency
docdivakar   8/16/2013 4:03:13 PM
NO RATINGS
@Bert: good points. I agree there is no immediate rush to implement Ethernet replacing CANs. In addition to the many good points you raised, there is also the issue of existing Ethernet PMDs to co-exist / replace CANs which have proven their robustness and reliability over the years in the automobile environment. There is of course industrial Ethernet physical media but their suitability to automobile environment has to be proven for reliability.

MP Divakar

alewr
User Rank
Rookie
Re: are companies behind this proposal?
alewr   8/16/2013 7:35:54 AM
NO RATINGS
i am totall agreed with you.

 
CYLINDER HEAD


ArLi0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Speed also solves latency
ArLi0   8/16/2013 5:12:33 AM
NO RATINGS
The solution using "generously overprovisioned local Ethernets" will not work in many situations (as replacement for FlexRay/CAN or even LIN). Such approach can work for i.e. telcos but in automotive it has limited applicability.

There are devices which need to be hard real-time and moreover you have to prove that you can achieve this hard real-time property (ISO 26262). A "good bandwidth" does not guarantee this.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Speed also solves latency
junko.yoshida   8/15/2013 10:48:29 PM
NO RATINGS
@Bert, as usual, thank you for your insightful comments here. Not creating a single point of failure makes a lot of sense.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Speed also solves latency
Bert22306   8/15/2013 4:09:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Migrating to Ethernet has been the trend for decades now. Even the telcos, who were often nay-sayers, have done this. ATM and SONET migrating to Ethernet as we speak.

No need to do this instantly. CAN buses can remain for strictly timed, local bus roles, until the subsystems are updated. At which point, my bet is, CAN buses will also be replaced by Ethernet.

A way to solve the latency problem is to create local Ethernets, generously overprovisioned, and make sure they remain overprovisioned. Which means, you make sure that wide bandwidth traffic does not intrude. You'll get good bandwidth and low latency, at a lower price than attempting to create fancy new synchronous buses.

The number of Ethernet switches required depends 100 percent on what the Ethernet(s) have to do. My own preference is always many small switches, properly distributed to be close to the client devices, to achieve robust reliability and survivability. You don't want that single point of failure, in other words. Signals should have redundant paths, and just like OBD-II monitors the emissions devices in the car, the Ethernet network(s) would also be monitored at all times, and failures reported.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: are companies behind this proposal?
junko.yoshida   8/15/2013 7:43:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Krisi, car companies are definitely embracing Ethernet in places where CAN or FlexRay can't address. For all those cameras now attached to a car for driver's assistance, CAN nor FlexRay can cut it due to the higher bandwidth required. Further if you want to update software in ECU, it could take like 30 min. If you do it over CAN. (remember flas memory is getting bigger and bigger.) So moving to Ethernet is a natural progression for Car OEMs. The question is how far Ethernet will penetrate inside a car and what needs to happen before that becomes a reality.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: are companies behind this proposal?
krisi   8/15/2013 6:21:51 AM
NO RATINGS
thank you Olaf

Olaf Barheine
User Rank
Rookie
Re: are companies behind this proposal?
Olaf Barheine   8/15/2013 5:49:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I think, a problem with CAN is that it is too slow. The OEMs need a faster solution e.g. for camera systems and other bandwidth consuming applications. And I think, they need a faster solution because they get problems to flash all the ECUs of a car at the production time.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
are companies behind this proposal?
krisi   8/14/2013 9:30:56 PM
NO RATINGS
I can see why NXP or Broadcome push for :automotive Ethernet...but are the car companies really behind this? what is wrong with CAN? (it is probably more expensive to deploy as Ethernet volumes are much larger, but technically?)



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
41 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
18 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)