Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
User Rank
Re: fire
LoserTriesAgain   8/25/2013 8:18:14 AM
I enjoy movies on DVD.

Renting and owning.

The latest is owning access to the "cloud" as a movie ownership option.

I'm a 'hands on' kind of guy. What happens when your cloud service is merged with another cloud service or decides to sell all of it's stored stuff to another cloud service?


Your link to your movie is dead? Who you going to call? Are movies higher or lower on the backup or encription list. When systems fail, as they do, what status does my stored movie have?

We will one day walk outside, look up, and say "what happened to my cloud?"

User Rank
Re: Cloud Storage Makes Dollars...for the providers
jaybus0   8/20/2013 7:59:38 AM
Another name for cloud storage would be wide area SAN. If the Internet were as fast as a typical SAN's local FC or Ethernet network, then it would be wondrfully useful. In the real world an Internet connection is orders of magnitude slower and/or far more expensive. It is more or less a solution in search of a problem. 

User Rank
Re: Cloud Storage Makes Dollars...for the providers
chanj0   8/19/2013 6:08:42 PM
I think Brian's points are valid and anyone who want to subscribe any cloud based storage service shall analyze their needs by going through all those points.

To me, there is at least 1 downsize of putting my storage to the cloud. Cloud service heavily relies on your broadband. In spite of accessing files anywhere, the advantage doesn't outpace the convenience of accessing files in a timely fashion. In addition, what if the ISP is doing maintenance work for an hour while I need a file, like now. Sometimes, I just don't want to take the chance.

I can see how corporation needs a highly redundency backup solution. I understand some individuals might prefer it as well. Yet, I think cloud storage is not for everyone. You should to a cost analysis before consideration subscribe the service.

User Rank
Remote Backup
HankWalker   8/19/2013 5:11:11 PM
If you don't have daily incremental remote backups, then you can't really say your data is safe. Fire, severe weather, flood, crime, etc., can all put your data at risk. The straightforward home solution is remote backup from Mozy, Carbonite, etc. For 1 TB, they charge from $100/year to $100/mo.


User Rank
I think you are all missing the economic point
J---   8/19/2013 2:44:27 PM
I think most of you are missing the economic point.

Let's start with the basics. An offsite storage company is far more likely to have incremental backups, recovery, etc. that works versus what you may do on your own. Even Dropbox has an unlimited history option. Keep in mind, nothing is every stopping you from making a backup every once in a while of everything you have in the cloud which is likely already mirrored on your own hardware. The odds of losing the mirrored cloud and your mirrored on site storage at the exact same time are so low as to not even be worth discussing. The odds of losing your local storage and your local backup at the same time are much higher, especially if you do not have off-site, but even if you do, how often are you doing that off-site storage.


Of course, even that is not the economic point. TIME IS MONEY!


What the poster failed to take into account is the amount of time he would spend maintaining his backup system, hardware installs, confirming proper operation (how often have you done a recovery check?), the time to move data off-site, etc.


I think you were looking at $130/month. What you described in terms of a backup regimen is easily going to lose you $130/month in lost productivity at hat you do best .... photography. Doing backups and maintaining networks is not what you do best (I hope being a photographer).


Realistically knowing a bit of the photography flow, you will have a local raid anyway for speed of access and then offsite mirroring for low speed long term backup.


As a consultant, I spend time consulting, not worrying about my backups. It is takes me even extra hour a month worrying about backups, it is too much.


On the security standpoint, if you are worried about prying eyes, use encryption.

User Rank
krisi   8/19/2013 10:19:22 AM
Excellent analysis Brian...I think the chance of Rackspace going up are much higher than fire in my office...I will gladly stay off-cloud...BTW, who was the marketing genius that created the term "cloud"? Storage area networks (SANs) existed long time before but one day this "wonderful" cloud technology appeared out of nowhere...Kris

User Rank
Re: A Private Cloud that Makes Sense
p_g   8/17/2013 5:20:45 PM
This makes lot snese to have private network and have it assessible via some IP link rather than putting files on cloud. I personally never get the concept of cloud. Why would I need my files on net and always accessible? Even if I do I would setup my FTP server and get static IP or alternate solution to acces it all the time. I will never have top feed cloud providers for their network/disk and salaries.

User Rank
Re: A Private Cloud that Makes Sense
Etmax   8/16/2013 10:34:48 PM
Sadly email still goes via your ISP even if you use POP unless you host your own domain

User Rank
so why is it popular?
markhahn0   8/16/2013 10:13:45 PM
yes, anyone who actually looks at cloud prices will be scratching their head.  why would anyone pay vendors that much money?  the funny part is that business types just utter the mantra "economies of scale" and assume that the market will guarantee an efficient price.  well, there's also the "no one was ever fired for buying IBM phenomenon".

User Rank
Re: Cloud Storage Makes Dollars...for the providers
jonw0224   8/16/2013 8:43:36 PM
I have an external drive and an internal one for backup. The external drive stays at work and I periodically bring it home to duplicate the internal drive. Fire protection most nights and duplicate backups. Faster than cloud backups too.

Page 1 / 2   >   >> Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...