Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Simple benchmark from the users' perspective
junko.yoshida   8/20/2013 5:35:32 PM
NO RATINGS
DMcCunney and MP, I think you are both saying the same thing.

Hardware benchmarks can't cover the UI or OS matters. 

Well, maybe it's high time for some bright marketing people to come up with UI benchmarketing!

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
Re: Benchmarks for Whole Phones Needed
docdivakar   8/20/2013 4:35:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Looks like the industry loves benchmarking -I didn't know the hangover from Dhrystone & Whetstone would last this long! I find this whole exercise amusing and largely place this on the bright marketing folks to find that 'differentiation' now that the mobile computing space is getting more competitive.

I think one point lost in this 'system-level' benchmarking is the definition of the 'system' itself! Smart phones are much more than yesterday's pure computing devices. A phone with the best hardware benchmark can end up losing when it lacks the best operating system the user interacts with.

MP Divakar

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: System-level benchmarking
DMcCunney   8/20/2013 3:34:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Ideally, I want something that is effectively open source: I want to be able to reproduce the test environment, run the same tests on the same gear, and get the same test results as the people posting thier benchmarks.  If I don't, something is off somewhere.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: System-level benchmarking
DMcCunney   8/20/2013 3:30:56 PM
NO RATINGS
And you wind up with a paraphrase of the line about opinions: "Standards are like assholes.  Everybody has one."  With the corollary "incompatible with everyone else's..."

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: System-level benchmarking
junko.yoshida   8/20/2013 3:26:25 PM
NO RATINGS
DMcCunney, I agree. As long as BDTI makes its benchmarking methodology transparent, smart people in the industry should be able to spot if there are any anomaly, convenient omissions or modifications done to the testing itself.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: System-level benchmarking
Max The Magnificent   8/20/2013 1:55:12 PM
NO RATINGS
@DMcCunney: It reminds me of the comment "The nice thing about standards is there's so many of them!"

Another good one is "Standards are great .... everyone should have one!" :-)

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: Simple benchmark from the users' perspective
DMcCunney   8/20/2013 1:51:01 PM
NO RATINGS
I like #2, too.  But the problem is that BDTI is attempting to develop hardware benchmarks, and the number of strokes/touches needed to do something is a UI matter, and will be dependent on the OS, the UI it presents to the user, and the apps the user runs. It will have only an indirect relation to hardware, and a well designed phone might handily beat the competition on that measurement while having the least poswerful hardware.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: System-level benchmarking
DMcCunney   8/20/2013 1:46:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Structured in a manner that will emphasize the strengths of their offerings?

It reminds me of the comment "The nice thing about standards is there's so many of them!"

I don't have a problem with BDTI being funded by Qualcomm to do this, as long as they are open about their methodology, what they are measuring, and what conclusions might be drawn from it.  Someone has to pay the costs of developing such a thing,

Once they have something they think works, the next step is to pitch it to the appropriate industry consortium as the standard way you measure what the benchmarks track.  Then you make popcorn and sit back and watch the fun.

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Simple benchmark from the users' perspective
junko.yoshida   8/20/2013 10:20:40 AM
NO RATINGS
@prabhakar, I like your #2 on the list. How many key strokes (or touch) are necessary to get to the function you need to use is important.

 

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
Simple benchmark from the users' perspective
prabhakar_deosthali   8/20/2013 9:25:55 AM
NO RATINGS
In my opinion, benchmarking of smart phones as far as the end user is concerned should be done on the following criterion

1. The Battery recharge interval

2.  The no of keys/touches required to perform a function

3. How fast the phone boots up

 

This simple criterion will test the processor speed, memory access, UI and power consumption.

 

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...