Never knew NASA has nice structures like this. Great history and photos - one will hope they do not break them. This looks like the Bird Nest which China showed the world during the olympics. One of the stadia looked like that.
You're right. It does look like the Bird's Nest, @goafrit. Or the world's biggest jungle gym. I hope no one tries to climb it. Prior to the toxic asbestos tiles being removed, the hangar housed an aviation museum. I saw on the news that the museum was looking for a new home or to keep the one they had. I wonder what happened to them. More reading: GSA and NASA seek rehab proposals for historic Hangar One airship station
I have enjoyed several trips to Ames over the years for expos in their giant hangars and new conferences at their supercomputer center. I've enjoyed seeing the fragments of moon rocks on display there, too.
That Hanger One shell could be used to make the world's best tropical greenhouse in the Bay Area if NASA only used their imagination a little. It is almost 7 acres, and the height would allow a mature tropical forest canopy. They could even put a canopy walk or tram in the thing. Skinning it with polycarbonate would not be too costly. Treating the steel structure for corrosion protection in a high humidity environment would be an issue, but is likely solvable. NASA needs to think outside the box a bit...
Really some of the "mega grand" things happening there. Smart phone based satellite was the odd person out being the tiniest stuff...but it was a good idea thought. Technologies similar to "forward osmosis water processor" could console all scary people (including me) who think the drinking water problem looming in the future. I am sure there are researches going on to process & use sea water for the same.
We have similar former Airship hangers in Tustin, Orange County CA. I've heard it is difficult to find new purpose because those structures do not meet todays safety standards, such as fire or earthquake.
@y_sasaki Interesting. Thanks. Maybe when we all get our jetpacks, these dirigble hangars could become indoor jetpack lounges or just an indoor space to try out the jetpack. Maybe not. Or a place for testing drones.
A long time ago I talked to a guy that did radio controlled planes. They wanted to have races and stuff in one of these but there were insurance reasons that they couldn't because the buildings didn't meet current code. Its a shame, that would have been cool.
It could possibly be subdivided but unfortunately the cost to bring it up to modern day code might make that financially difficult. It is just easier to build new modern buildings for more manageable sizes.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.