Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Luis Sanchez
User Rank
Author
New versions for everything?
Luis Sanchez   8/30/2013 11:45:59 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the big changes are really imposed by breaking technologies. Perhaps we can say, by new hardware. 

How much of an improvement could be achieved with small tweaks here and there? 

Can a soft topology/architechture change really make a big impact?

clayman
User Rank
Author
Optical transceiver can use cable?
clayman   8/29/2013 8:24:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't know the following desciption:

100G new OPTICAL tranceiver uses 10G CABLE?  Maybe the cable is fiber?

Charles.Desassure
User Rank
Author
Small Switches...
Charles.Desassure   8/27/2013 6:41:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Small switches sound like an excellent idea for the networking environment.   If successful, it should help LAN Administrators with the task of solving network problems quickly.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: OpenFlow in transition
LarryM99   8/26/2013 1:03:06 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems like they are trying to move enterprise networks from being general-purpose superhighways to being application-specific feeder roads. This may make sense in some specific applications, but it seems like there is a danger to making them too specific to particular applications which will change over time. SDNs are supposed to do that, but by allocating network resources at a software level which can adapt and change over time.

The argument for this is that enterprise applications don't change often. Unfortunately, baking the details into your network design is one way of ensuring that that description becomes even more self-fulfilling.

Kinnar
User Rank
Author
Re: OpenFlow in transition
Kinnar   8/26/2013 5:47:50 AM
NO RATINGS
As per the talk of Tom Edsall from Insieme Networks it seem that they might be introducing or coming up with a solution of the described problem, may it will be a new uncovered protocol may grew up.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
Re: Don't like fat trees
KB3001   8/25/2013 6:28:23 AM
NO RATINGS
@Bert22306, the centralised control in the porposed SDN is meant to adapt against failures such as the ones you describe, but also to different App-specific traffic demands.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Don't like fat trees
Bert22306   8/23/2013 5:59:01 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not sure I understand what these "app-savvy switches" are really being asked to do, but I've always stayed away from any of these "fat tree" topologies, in my work.

Almost always, when I hear keynotes like this one, I know that I'm missing some key concept that the speaker has in mind. This would be no exception. Whether this key concept is generically applicable to networks, or whether it only applies to data centers, therefore escapes me.

My inclination has always been to design networks with many small switches, well distributed, in as dense a mesh as one can afford. This offers short paths between any two hosts and no prossibility of one or two switch failures creating a major catastrophy.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
OpenFlow in transition
rick merritt   8/23/2013 2:31:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Interestingly both Edsall and a Googler who keynoted the day before (see link below) said protocols are still in an early definiton stage and OpenFlow is more of a starting point than a key piece of the SDN implementation.

 
2013-08-21Slideshow: Tour Google's Software Defined Net




Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...