Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Interesting article
rick merritt   8/27/2013 8:56:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Better traffic control and accident avoidance sound like two great apps for this technology. I'd love to see what the infrastucture network would look like.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Interesting article
junko.yoshida   8/27/2013 6:20:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the cool video, Andrzej11. 

It explains why we need V2I very well.

But here's the thing. 

It was late 1999 when FCC allocated 75MHz of spectrum in the 5.9GHz band for DSRC -- dedicated short-range communication for V2V and V2I. Carmakers, even though fully aware of the importance of the V2V and V2I more than a decade. have been sitting on that spectrum for more than a decade.

I don't think I am the only skeptic in the world if this whole transportation infrastructure thing will ever take off in the U.S.

Andrzej11
User Rank
CEO
Re: Interesting article
Andrzej11   8/27/2013 1:23:14 PM
NO RATINGS
@Junko

You ask, "Then, do we even need V2V or V2I? If every car gets so smart after all, what's the point of V2V and V2I?"

The answer to your first question is of course and to better answer your second question I would suggest you watch this video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pbAI40dK0A . High volume intersection control for autonomous vehicles would require V2I while you could get away with V2V for low volume intersections.

bk11
User Rank
Manager
Re: Bad drivers come in all shapes and sizes
bk11   8/27/2013 1:10:39 PM
NO RATINGS
"self-driving cars could be counted on to avoid an accident and make way without any fuss."

Until someone figures out how to reprogram it to be more aggressive.  I'd give it about 30 minutes after the first one hits the road...

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Metcalfe's law was already manifested in cars
junko.yoshida   8/27/2013 10:24:53 AM
NO RATINGS
p_g, thanks for your explanation. Understood, and it makes sense.

p_g
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Metcalfe's law was already manifested in cars
p_g   8/27/2013 6:04:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Junko,

 

if you see today's sensor/radar give you feature that help in driving or makes driving easy but they still dont take over responsibility of driver. They work in congunction with driver. Reason being the data from these sensor is patial and tough to process. Also its very compute intensive + required very sophisticated AI software to give accurate environmental information. Sensors are popular today since they dont need infrastructure changes to work. I guess thats the best you can achieve from them. Like Adaptive cruse cannot detect if lane is turning and car ahead is in same lane or alternate lane. This information need camera view to complete this information, which make system even complicated and error prone.

 

All this can be simplified with V2x system and its more guranteed read of enviornmeet for self driven and doesn't need much post processing also.

p_g
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Interesting article
p_g   8/27/2013 5:54:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I dont think so. If by 2030 we are expecting self drivern car then thae path to hit that stage will go though V2x cars. I dont think google car will turn into reality straight. AI is still not at the stage where they can create intelligence of 6 months old baby, for self driver car without V2x assist features is bit of long shot.

 

I believe if self driven car happen they will be self driven using special driving lanes where every step is guided by V2x communication channel. Thats more reliable means of reading neighborhood that using camera's e.t.c and processing image to infer the nearby environment.

p_g
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Glad for my Ford escape
p_g   8/27/2013 5:44:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Unless we define standard communication protocol which is used by every car maker. Then brand name wont make any difference...

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Metcalfe's law was already manifested in cars
junko.yoshida   8/26/2013 5:49:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Bert, I agree with your assertion:

 And vehicle to vehicle and to infrastructure comms are imperative for fully autonomous operation,


But when you think about using technologies such as sensors, radars and others that are already available today (in Advance Driver Assitance System) combined with LTE cellular network connection, for example, do we really need V2X? Am I off base to imagine that we can actually get to close to what self-driving cars need without V2X? 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Interesting article
junko.yoshida   8/26/2013 5:44:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I think you are absolutely right, @smallplanetmatt. 

I do realize the great value in V2X. My question, though, is that the concept of V2X is great, but seriously, how long will it take for that to become a reality? In the United States, especially, I think it could take 20-30 years...

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
9 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).