This is a fantastic story George! It is always surprising to hear about some of the oversights that happen out there, especially in the medical industry. You'd think there would be some kind of additional level of scrutiny, but I guess theres not. It isn't going into space after all.
I love the fact that you say that your idea was "just good enough to work." I think that's one area that all engineers can never get enough experience, which is "Determining when good is good enough!" Quite a trial by fire for a new engineer!
Nice story. Sometimes there are some of these design flaws that somehow escape unnoticed while design phase or reliability testing phase. I remember some of nokia phones bursted or produced lot of interference when in gas stations or phone kept on charging and at the same time talking on the call.
"How good is good enough" is a fair question, and for an answer, when designing production line equipmet for an auto company the specification is simple: "The system must not fail at any time under any condition". So it makes sense to go for a bit more than just good enough.
Most of the time the customers are able to understand that most of the time.
Great story George. I used to maintain a fleet of big old CRT terminals, with analogue power supplies, and power supply connectors were my # 1 problem. The board connectors just had a circular pin, a blade pin as in the old AT power supplies w=is a much better idea,
And a good fix too, glad you got some recognition for it!
@kfield: Wow David, maintaining a big fleet of "CRT terminals" almost sounds Dickensian today!!!
What makes you think it was a "big fleet"? (Are you projecting again?) What David actually said was that he used to maintain "a fleet of big old CRT terminals" -- which leaves us none the wiser as to whether it was a small, medium, or large fleet.
I'm sorry -- I can't help it -- I am an anal retentive engineer LOL
PS It's not the size of one's fleet -- it's what one does with it that counts :-)
@Karen, Max....I said "a fleet of BIG old CRT terminals"....note the position of the word BIG....the terminals were big, not the fleet...... were you as fleet of mind as you are of wit, you would have noticed this :-)
When I was back in college we were donated what is now an antique video graphics machine called a "Harry"
In 1985, Quantel released the "Harry" effects compositing system/non-linear editor. The Harry was designed to render special effects in non-real time to the video recorded on its built-in hard disk array (much like most computer based non-linear editing systems today). The hard disk array used drives made by Fujitsu, and were connected to the Harry using a proprietary parallel interface, much like a modern-day RAID array. Technically, it was the first all-digital non-linear editing system, since it could also do editing of the video that was recorded on the Harry. Due to technical constraints of the time, the Harry could only record 80 seconds of video, albeit encoded in full broadcast-quality, uncompressed D1-style 8-bit CCIR 601 format. This aside, the Harry was quite an advanced machine, and the only system like it for its time.
When we were fitting it not only were the HDDs a three man lift each, but the mainframe had a PSU which mated to it with 3/4in copper rods for the DC. It looked like some giant Swiss mains connector. Along with the Klystron PSUs that I used to handle I have to declare that I am a wimp when it comes to HT and high current, I stay away.
Great story George! You have a real knack for humorous writing. I love the line: "When a boiler explosion starts sounding like a good thing, you know you're in a pretty dark place." But seriously, you do raise a good point. Thanks to taking your dog for a walk, you thought of a solution. I think one of the fundamental problems of our work culture today is that we are constantly needing to be more "productive" and have no TIME to think of the good ideas. Or even the mediocre ideas that might lead to good ones...
@Janine, you are absolutely right. Never any time to think. Never any time to do it right the first time, but always time to do it over... Thinking always pays off!
As an RF power guy, connectors and packaging are almost always my biggest headaches. They cost too much, they take up too much room, they don't have enough current capacity, they break...etc, etc, etc. Mundane, boring, unsexy areas like this are where advances could have a real impact. Given time :-)
This interesting story certainly is quite entertaining, no doubt. But what I would like would be more of an explanation as to just how the fix fixed the product and was able to have the product still providing the functions that the customers expected it to do. So what we have is a great setup for the story and then a very short description of the wonderful fix that somehow saves the day. A better description of how that fix kept the thing going would be quite in order.
I held back from a more descriptive explanation as this circuit is currently going through the patent process and the panel of patent attorneys would probably frown on a public description at this time.
Basically it checks both the voltage and currents, in this case checking one is not definitive enough, then it shuts things down if things look askew. And it periodically tries a restart just in case the fault condition goes away. Ret is hush-hush for now.
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.