Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
Wilco1   9/10/2013 6:06:35 AM
NO RATINGS
Avoton is certainly an improvement on the ridiculously slow and inefficient Centerton, but it is not as efficient as ARM chips. The 40nm Calxeda server node uses 6-7W in total including DRAM and interconnect, while 4C Avoton starts at 13W - that's only for the CPU, not the DRAM and interconnects... 

Calxeda will move to 28nm with their next generation in a few weeks and 20nm next year. Then there is AMCC with X-Gene, AMD with Hierofalcon, NVidia with Denver - all having 8 and 16-core 64-bit ARM server chips to be released in 2014 and 2015. It looks like Avoton will end up in the exact same situation as Atom is today.

Gondalf
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
Gondalf   9/9/2013 4:18:12 PM
NO RATINGS
It's pretty clear that you live in your own dream.

Any attempt of Calxeda to server market is just now truncated, Avoton is clearly a winner in the perf/watt parameter and this will be good even for 20nm planar Calxeda socs. Not a chance, once Calxeda will shift to A57 the power consumption will grow like a hell.

Moreover there is a 16 core Intel Soc in Q3/2014, bye bye competitors.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 100 mm2 Atom
resistion   9/5/2013 8:24:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The Avoton is a 34 X 28 mm2 package, and the photo seems to indicate the die is about 1/10 (~1/3 X 1/3) of that so I estimate now about 100 mm2 for Avoton, which would be about 4x the years ago die size of Atom Silverthorne. At that time the package was as small as 13 X 14 though it was often 22 X 22.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/09/04/intel_avoton_rangeley_atom_c2000/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
rick merritt   9/5/2013 6:21:41 PM
NO RATINGS
@Wilco1: Admitedly the Intel comparisons are not ideal (64 vs 32 bit CPUs eg). However, note that Avoton is shipping now.

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
Wilco1   9/5/2013 4:47:01 PM
NO RATINGS
I seriously doubt Intel can beat ARM on perf/W. AnandTech showed several 6W Calxeda nodes beating low power Xeon CPUs on performance as well as perf/Watt. Next-gen 28nm Calxeda nodes based on A15 will be available in a few weeks, and should improve performance as well as perf/W further.

So Intel can only win by comparing not-yet-released 22nm chips with 40nm ones which have been shipping for a year...

And the real like for like comparison will be next year with 64-bit Cortex-A57 on 20nm. A57 is significantly faster than A15 and reaches far higher frequencies as well.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
rick merritt   9/5/2013 4:29:56 PM
NO RATINGS
There are a lot of shoes yet to fall here but Marc Andreeessen today was very bullish on the ARM wave in a talk today

See  http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1319417&page_number=2

 

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
LarryM99   9/5/2013 3:41:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, performance per watt is probably more important to a degree to the server market than cost. Keep in mind that power is an ongoing expense while you only pay once for the chip - at least until Intel and the other chip companies can figure out a way to lease them...

Also, the CPU chip cost is only one component of the cost for a server, both in terms of dollars and watts. Do we know how different a server board BOM cost is between ARM and x86? Likewise, is the only significant power usage difference between those server boards the CPU itself?

halherta
User Rank
Manager
ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
halherta   9/5/2013 1:39:35 PM
NO RATINGS
There's no doubt that Intel can beat ARM when using performance per Watt as a metric. However traditionally ARM beats Intel on cost. So in devices where best performance is not the goal (smartphones, tablets e.t.c) ARM won and will continue to win because of its lower cost.

It will be interesting to see who wins on the server front. Performance is obviously more crucial in servers....But the cost metric is also just as important.

 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Any other benchmarks out there
rick merritt   9/5/2013 1:23:56 PM
NO RATINGS
@MP: I did not get as many specific power numbers as I wanted to see. Basically Intel just did perf/watt at the node level, no core to core and no deep dive across workloads yet.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
rick merritt   9/5/2013 1:22:27 PM
NO RATINGS
@TanjB: Right you are, the big shift from server CPUs to SoCs is something you can see in the very size of the packages

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
Sheetal.Pandey
 
Sheetal.Pandey
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
 
resistion
 
Charles.Desassure
 
Charles.Desassure
 
Charles.Desassure
 
David Ashton
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Carlos Bueno

Adventures in Userland
Carlos Bueno
Post a comment
Editor’s Note: Excerpted from Lauren Ipsum: A story about computer science and other improbable things, author Carlos Bueno introduces us to Lauren and her adventures in ...

Max Maxfield

Tired Old iPad 2 vs. Shiny New iPad Air 2
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I remember when the first iPad came out deep in the mists of time we used to call 2010. Actually, that's only four years ago, but it seems like a lifetime away -- I mean; can you remember ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...