Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Any other benchmarks out there
rick merritt   9/4/2013 1:01:44 PM
NO RATINGS
OK you dozen ARM server SoC vendors, if you have other numbers in the lab, let's hear them.

resistion
User Rank
Author
1000 mm2 Atom?
resistion   9/5/2013 1:16:14 AM
NO RATINGS
The footprint is way large. Remember when Atom was only 25 mm2; it's all grown up now, I guess.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
Sheetal.Pandey   9/5/2013 7:19:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel and arm both are leaders in their own space. But competition comes when one try to enter in others space. I guess its good forthe whole electronics indusstry if both continue doing good business.

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: package sizes
resistion   9/5/2013 9:34:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess should be comparing package sizes, then it should be ~200 mm2 vs ~1000 mm2.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
Re: Any other benchmarks out there
docdivakar   9/5/2013 11:05:56 AM
NO RATINGS
@Rick: GOOD article! On the power requirements for Avoton, how does it compare to equivalent ARM processor/s at the same clock frequency?

Regarding "dense forest of passives", this is something that can be addressed by the motherboard designers. Obviously we don't have the info on routing congestion in the vicinity of Avoton chip. Otherwise many  of the passives could have been embedded which adds some cost penalty.

MP Divakar

TanjB
User Rank
Author
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
TanjB   9/5/2013 12:24:23 PM
NO RATINGS
compared to the fingernail, the chip cap looks to be enclosing about 50 mm^2, not 1,000.  50 is jelly bean size for a CPU or SOC these days.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
rick merritt   9/5/2013 1:22:27 PM
NO RATINGS
@TanjB: Right you are, the big shift from server CPUs to SoCs is something you can see in the very size of the packages

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Any other benchmarks out there
rick merritt   9/5/2013 1:23:56 PM
NO RATINGS
@MP: I did not get as many specific power numbers as I wanted to see. Basically Intel just did perf/watt at the node level, no core to core and no deep dive across workloads yet.

halherta
User Rank
Author
ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
halherta   9/5/2013 1:39:35 PM
NO RATINGS
There's no doubt that Intel can beat ARM when using performance per Watt as a metric. However traditionally ARM beats Intel on cost. So in devices where best performance is not the goal (smartphones, tablets e.t.c) ARM won and will continue to win because of its lower cost.

It will be interesting to see who wins on the server front. Performance is obviously more crucial in servers....But the cost metric is also just as important.

 

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
LarryM99   9/5/2013 3:41:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, performance per watt is probably more important to a degree to the server market than cost. Keep in mind that power is an ongoing expense while you only pay once for the chip - at least until Intel and the other chip companies can figure out a way to lease them...

Also, the CPU chip cost is only one component of the cost for a server, both in terms of dollars and watts. Do we know how different a server board BOM cost is between ARM and x86? Likewise, is the only significant power usage difference between those server boards the CPU itself?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

My Mom the Radio Star
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
I've said it before and I'll say it again -- it's a funny old world when you come to think about it. Last Friday lunchtime, for example, I received an email from Tim Levell, the editor for ...

Bernard Cole

A Book For All Reasons
Bernard Cole
1 Comment
Robert Oshana's recent book "Software Engineering for Embedded Systems (Newnes/Elsevier)," written and edited with Mark Kraeling, is a 'book for all reasons.' At almost 1,200 pages, it ...

Martin Rowe

Leonard Nimoy, We'll Miss you
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Like many of you, I was saddened to hear the news of Leonard Nimoy's death. His Star Trek character Mr. Spock was an inspiration to many of us who entered technical fields.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Flash Poll