Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Any other benchmarks out there
rick merritt   9/4/2013 1:01:44 PM
NO RATINGS
OK you dozen ARM server SoC vendors, if you have other numbers in the lab, let's hear them.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
1000 mm2 Atom?
resistion   9/5/2013 1:16:14 AM
NO RATINGS
The footprint is way large. Remember when Atom was only 25 mm2; it's all grown up now, I guess.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
Sheetal.Pandey   9/5/2013 7:19:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel and arm both are leaders in their own space. But competition comes when one try to enter in others space. I guess its good forthe whole electronics indusstry if both continue doing good business.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: package sizes
resistion   9/5/2013 9:34:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess should be comparing package sizes, then it should be ~200 mm2 vs ~1000 mm2.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
Re: Any other benchmarks out there
docdivakar   9/5/2013 11:05:56 AM
NO RATINGS
@Rick: GOOD article! On the power requirements for Avoton, how does it compare to equivalent ARM processor/s at the same clock frequency?

Regarding "dense forest of passives", this is something that can be addressed by the motherboard designers. Obviously we don't have the info on routing congestion in the vicinity of Avoton chip. Otherwise many  of the passives could have been embedded which adds some cost penalty.

MP Divakar

TanjB
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
TanjB   9/5/2013 12:24:23 PM
NO RATINGS
compared to the fingernail, the chip cap looks to be enclosing about 50 mm^2, not 1,000.  50 is jelly bean size for a CPU or SOC these days.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 1000 mm2 Atom?
rick merritt   9/5/2013 1:22:27 PM
NO RATINGS
@TanjB: Right you are, the big shift from server CPUs to SoCs is something you can see in the very size of the packages

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Any other benchmarks out there
rick merritt   9/5/2013 1:23:56 PM
NO RATINGS
@MP: I did not get as many specific power numbers as I wanted to see. Basically Intel just did perf/watt at the node level, no core to core and no deep dive across workloads yet.

halherta
User Rank
Manager
ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
halherta   9/5/2013 1:39:35 PM
NO RATINGS
There's no doubt that Intel can beat ARM when using performance per Watt as a metric. However traditionally ARM beats Intel on cost. So in devices where best performance is not the goal (smartphones, tablets e.t.c) ARM won and will continue to win because of its lower cost.

It will be interesting to see who wins on the server front. Performance is obviously more crucial in servers....But the cost metric is also just as important.

 

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: ARM may still beat Intel when cost is considered
LarryM99   9/5/2013 3:41:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, performance per watt is probably more important to a degree to the server market than cost. Keep in mind that power is an ongoing expense while you only pay once for the chip - at least until Intel and the other chip companies can figure out a way to lease them...

Also, the CPU chip cost is only one component of the cost for a server, both in terms of dollars and watts. Do we know how different a server board BOM cost is between ARM and x86? Likewise, is the only significant power usage difference between those server boards the CPU itself?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
1 Comment
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
9 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).