Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
junko.yoshida   9/6/2013 8:27:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@cd2012, Very well put. The lesson you mentioned here is still very relevant.

cd2012
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
cd2012   9/6/2013 8:35:21 AM
NO RATINGS
I once worked for a company that had produced one of the first (if not the first) integrated GSM baseband & transceiver chips.  From the hardware perspective, it was a crowning technical achievement and would have resulted in significant BOM savings to customers, but they weren't eating it up...why not?  Customers didn't want to invest the significant time and resources to change their firmware/software stack.  It didn't help that a competitor bought out a critical portion of the software stack either.


The lesson is don't understimate the support costs for hardware.

 

 

 

marhululu
User Rank
Author
Re: A win win win
marhululu   9/6/2013 7:58:55 AM
NO RATINGS
QBRCM maybe better

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
junko.yoshida   9/6/2013 3:47:53 AM
NO RATINGS
@Hughston, I think we need to be reminded that RMC's parent, Renesas, has been financially in a dire state for some time now. The parent company pulled the plug on RMC's biz, not RMC's customers.

gtrax
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
gtrax   9/6/2013 1:28:54 AM
NO RATINGS
 >If the product was ready to go, then why didn't Renesas go with it? 

I don't think it was anything to do with technology or product readiness. Renesas just did not have the fuel run it and they wanted to focus on their core bussiness. Unfortunately mobile chipset was not one of them to give it any time to get the returns.

Hughston
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
Hughston   9/5/2013 7:37:31 PM
NO RATINGS
If the product was ready to go, then why didn't Renesas go with it? Same thing goes for the reported ST/Ericsson design that works. Companies go and get certified, but that does not mean it is a good working product ready for the market.  But several companies keep saying they're certified.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
junko.yoshida   9/5/2013 7:13:39 PM
NO RATINGS
@Hughston, personally, i never expected this to happen. As you correctly point out, Broadcom was doing all the LTE demos at the tradeshow, as though nothing had gone wrong. As for Renesas LTE modem, judging from some comments we received from Renesas Mobile engineers on our forum here at www.eetimes.com, the chip -- already certified by several operators -- is ready go, in the hands of a few customers. It appears Broadcom this time around has a real thing...

Hughston
User Rank
Author
Re: Another Acquisition?
Hughston   9/5/2013 6:13:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Beceem was almost a total loss. They were bought for their potential in LTE technology, not their other existing product lines. The tip off that there was trouble came a year ago. 

Hughston
User Rank
Author
Re: Will this be a threat to Qualcomm?
Hughston   9/5/2013 6:06:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I was wondering if you ever expected this to happen? Broadcomm was having problems with their design but doing demos at trade shows like everything was ok. Clearly things were not ok. Now I wonder if they are buying a working design this time or not. It seems other companies have gone quiet also about their progress.  

Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
A win win win
Frank Eory   9/5/2013 5:08:49 PM
NO RATINGS
A win for everyone involved -- BRCM, Renesas and the LTE development team.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
HardwIntr
 
IJD
 
MWagner_MA
 
txicos
 
imadur
 
andybe
 
Bruzzer
 
Bruzzer
 
CB_EE
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...