This is a major technological achievement. Hope they work more to make it apply to practical devices. It will interesting to know quantitative comparision - gain in speed, saving in power, voltage level required to operate it.
Is this about CMOS or the material? I think we can still have CMOS design paradigm with another material beside Silicon. I hope we crack this code soon as it is long overdue. Something needs to help provide a new path for the continuation of Moore's law
Yes quite true, the industries are desperately looking for the CMOS alternative that can work beyond Gigahertz, since this metal alternatives have got bandwidth ranging upto Terahertz, if this time the technology gets commercially accepted it will really open a new era.
Ok, so i'll be the first one to bite. What does this device actually do?
To me, it looks like a two terminal tunneling device with electrodes at two different work functions. The difference in work function means that the I/V behavior will be asymmetric, so it could show a weak diode like behavior, but probably still a lot different to what we are used to from semiconductor diodes.
Since there is no semiconductor involved, switching delays caused by minority carrier recombination (diffusion capacitance) should be absent. That is probabably the reason for the claim for speed. However there could be a disadvantage due to the extremely high capacitance of the MIM structure.
There are some other drawbacks too: The way quantum tunneling behaves in such a two layer devices means that there are some second order slope changes in the I/V behavior. The material used (Al2O3 and HfO2) are also prone to electron trapping. This means that there are most likely additional conduction mechanisms, which will give rise to device leakage at low bias, dielectric relaxation (1/t decaying current after switch) and noise.
So here are my questions:
What is the exact application of this device?
What are the relevant figures of merit that are optimized in respect to semiconductor diodes? How does it compare in the other ones?
How is this supposed to "beat CMOS" or lead to transistors? My understanding so far is, that this is a two- not three terminal device. So it can not replace a transistor.
Ok, after some web searching I found comprehensive information. Seems like the technology itself is not new and has already performed well in the past, but failed commercially due to lack of differentiating applications.
Phononscattering "How is this supposed to "beat CMOS" or lead to transistors? My understanding so far is, that this is a two- not three terminal device. So it can not replace a transistor."
For a two terminal device structure, think of light or microwave input as the third terminal. Where the device is mounted in a lightwaveguide or a microwave guide. As we push frequencies higher those two will tend to merge. Quantum coupling efficiency will be the equivalent of gain.
The reliability of MIMs has been a problem in the past and limited widespread use. Given reliability they may find application in optical detectors in high speed backplanes. Who knows when TSVs run out of signal carrying capacity optical detection MIMs might allow TSV to be just holes!!
It definitely IS a tunnel diode. But not a semiconductor but a metal electrode one. The difference is, that the semiconductor tunnel diode of the 60ies shows a region of negative differential resistance which allows some interesting applications as oscillator nd so on. The MIM diode can not show this kind of behavior due to the different band structure of the electrodes.
My current understanding of the MIIM diode is, that its main application is as a demodulator/detecter for very high freqiencies.
A tunneling-based device may be ideally designed or optimized for high nonlinearity. But it should be recognized that tunneling is not expected to be a high current output mechanism matching CMOS. A MOSFET that is off is already a tunneling barrier (reverse bias pn junction depletion zone) with nonlinearity.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.