Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
LennyP
User Rank
Author
Re: Must be 32 bit
LennyP   9/21/2013 10:06:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Considering the only requirements we know from the article was "to offer a remote maintenance capability with high security." it's rather far fetched to claim a "poor technical decision" as you maintain.  There are lots of reasons, besides the level of security provided, which would come into play in the decision by Daikin; think ease of use, maintainability, support, etc.

 Using your reference design for a tablet with military grade security is not revalent as this is not a tablet, not needing to meet military anything, and only "high security."


And, no, I'm not associated with Intel, Freescale, ARM, or anyone else; I'm a retired engineer with well over thirty years experience designing embedded systems. 

 

jaybus0
User Rank
Author
Re: Raspi
jaybus0   9/20/2013 8:40:53 AM
NO RATINGS
The 80376 was replaced by the 80386EX, which still kept the static core capable uf running at low clock speeds all the way down to halt to save power. But it also kept the 26-bit addressing, so wouldn't be appropriate for re-implementing at a smaller process size without a major update. But I do think it is probably a shrunken older core. I chose the P54C because it has already been worked on for the Single-chip Cloud Computer project and Larrabee.

sw guy
User Rank
Author
Re: Raspi
sw guy   9/18/2013 7:58:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Remember the 80376 processor ?

jaybus0
User Rank
Author
Re: Raspi
jaybus0   9/18/2013 7:10:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I suspect it is one of the P54C-like cores designed for the Single-chip Cloud Computer project or something very similar. 

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: Raspi
LarryM99   9/16/2013 6:11:45 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems to me that it would make sense to strip off legacy support in a product like this. Why carry along MS-DOS compatability and segmented memory models when they are competing with ARMs that have a much cleaner architecture? The x86 has been overdue for cleaning out the attic for quite a while. Does anyone know if that is what they are doing here?

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
Re: Curious about Potential Packages
elctrnx_lyf   9/14/2013 3:19:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is definitely doing a lot more than what we could actually imagine. So there is still much more to Intel.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Raspi
rick merritt   9/13/2013 3:54:52 PM
NO RATINGS
@Victor: Excellent question. The consensus here is it will be a 486/Pentium class CPU, but Intel is not saying yet.

victortagayun
User Rank
Author
Raspi
victortagayun   9/13/2013 3:01:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Will it have the pricepoint and performance of raspi? Or is it of different league?

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
Re: Curious about Potential Packages
Sanjib.A   9/12/2013 10:56:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Happy to hear that this tiny chip could give 486, Pentium kind of performance, that would be great!! Will this be somewhere close to the SoC launched by AMD recently: G-series SoC? Probably having lower performance and features than that?

The part that scares me is "...suggesting it is more of a rushed trial balloon than a nailed-down product and strategy.

I would dare not think about using it if there are no clear strategy and a clear road-map. Any tentative timeline announced for its release?

Aeroengineer
User Rank
Author
Re: Curious about Potential Packages
Aeroengineer   9/12/2013 3:23:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I will be very much interested to hear this.  Some of the Cortex M devices are reaching this level of performance.  If Intel comes down this far, and QFN/QFP packages are available, I could see this being a possible device that a hobbiest could use.  I will be very interested to see more about this device.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...