Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 10   >   >>
BillWM
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
BillWM   9/26/2013 5:01:32 PM
NO RATINGS
The PQFP and similar packages are better for this but still have limits to the thermal cycling issue -- This can be partly addressed with underfills for All the different types of packages -- When thinking of the ROHS aspects to the underfill -- remember that half as many boards will need to be built -- providing a much bigger impact in this Aspect of Underfill vs No Underfill -- also not using the corner three balls enhances life by at least a factor of two -- with underfill and no corner BGA ball use one can get 5-10x the life out of a BGA in an aerospace application.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
Max The Magnificent   9/26/2013 4:47:43 PM
NO RATINGS
@BillWM: ...(50-80G's)

Ah, much like driving with my mother (LOL)

BillWM
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
BillWM   9/26/2013 4:33:05 PM
NO RATINGS
The boards have to pass the shock test in all axis -- the columns will shear in two of the axis without the supporting mount. (50-80G's)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
Max The Magnificent   9/26/2013 4:22:41 PM
NO RATINGS
@BillWM: The CGA's often require an IC mount that is around the peripheral of the board for high shock applications.  (Example hard landing with an aircraft)

Is this because the peripherly of the board is better supported, while the center tends to flex more?

(Can't we just ask the pilots to make softer landings? " :-)

BillWM
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
BillWM   9/26/2013 4:19:03 PM
NO RATINGS
The CGA's often require an IC mount that is around the peripheral of the device for high shock applications.  (Example hard landing with an aircraft)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
Max The Magnificent   9/26/2013 2:34:42 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet: Aren't there issues with maintaining column stiffness under stress?  :-)

They are formed from a stiffer mix in the middle and a softer (more meltable) mix at the ends. My understanding is that they are very rugged and reliable and are used in things like military applications.

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
betajet   9/26/2013 2:18:51 PM
NO RATINGS
I haven't had experience with column grid arrays.  I would think you'd still have the concern that solder doesn't flex as reliably as copper or aluminum.  Aren't there issues with maintaining column stiffness under stress?  :-)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
Max The Magnificent   9/26/2013 10:03:16 AM
NO RATINGS
@betajet: My chief worry is stresses on the balls caused by thermal mis-match between a BGA package and its underlying PC board

Being a string man, I'm going to totally ignore the opertunity to make jokes about stresses on your balls due to thermal management and instead ask if you've had any experiance with column grid arrays (CGAs) in which the solder balls are replaces with solder columns that mitigate against thermal stress (much like wearing looser undergarments :-)

zeeglen
User Rank
Author
Re: A Hackery of Software Developers
zeeglen   9/25/2013 7:45:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Poking proctological fun at non-engineers:

A promise of politicians

A scourge of salesmen

A loathe of lawyers

A bill of doctors

A menagerie (or zoo) of managers

A butt of bosses

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: A Horripilation of Ball Grid Arrays
betajet   9/19/2013 6:46:28 PM
NO RATINGS
FYI: Disadvantages of BGAs.  My chief worry is stresses on the balls caused by thermal mis-match between a BGA package and its underlying PC board.  Those tiny solder balls don't flex like proper metal leads -- they crack.  And who knows whether those mechanical stresses are causing tin whiskers, since that phenomenon is not well understood.  "Oh my ears and whiskers!"

<<   <   Page 2 / 10   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...