Breaking News
Comments
LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Color me skeptical
LarryM99   9/20/2013 5:27:25 PM
NO RATINGS
I am really wondering how much of this is actual engineering optimization, as opposed to synchronization of marketing plans. Intel gets to claim an advantage in flash access time (Show me the numbers!) while SanDisk gets de facto design wins. I am also leery of single-sourcing for a component. That being said, maybe there is something here. I will be interestd in seeing third-party tests of this claim.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
Re: Color me skeptical
elctrnx_lyf   9/22/2013 7:30:39 AM
NO RATINGS
There would be a possibility that contract between Intel and Sandisk would stop the later to not to sell the technology to any other tablet maker.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: Color me skeptical
DMcCunney   9/22/2013 5:17:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed on "show me the numbers".  I also note that this claim is specific to SanDisk's iNand Extreme package, which is presumably the high priced spread.

So the next question is "How many manufacturers are making tablets with Intel Inside that might be a customer for this?"

I await a SanDisk announcement of high-end flash optimized to work with current ARM designs...

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Color me skeptical
Peter Clarke   9/23/2013 6:20:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Or maybe it is the case that SanDisk iNAND Extreme is already optimized for ARM based designs and that some change has been made to benefit Bay Trail

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: Color me skeptical
LarryM99   9/23/2013 2:00:54 PM
NO RATINGS
It could be, Peter. Either way it points up the fact that in the current tablet / handset market ARM is the 800 lb gorilla and Intel is the newcomer. The fact that it is a very well-heeled newcomer means that it can get some accomodations from established support players like SanDisk. It will be fun to watch to see if that translates to market success.

alex_m1
User Rank
Author
general question?
alex_m1   9/21/2013 7:44:26 AM
NO RATINGS
A general question: if you look at logic processes, the most economical one is 28nm, because it doesn't require double patterning. Why doesn't this apply to flash processes?

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: general question?
resistion   9/22/2013 10:21:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Great question. Flash has used DP since 3x nm, they may have driven costs down little by little, layer by layer. DRAM also introduced layer by layer. Non-memory just getting started. I'm also surprised to hear complaints but maybe it's all about flexibility. Memory designs are restricted anyway.

alex_m1
User Rank
Author
Re: general question?
alex_m1   9/23/2013 10:33:43 AM
NO RATINGS
@resistion: Like you said it could be just issues of learning and flexbility needed. If so , that might mean that highly structured designs like fpga/easic would have major benefits when moving to next node. I wonder how far the easic structured asic form asic efficeny and how far a benefit in a single node would get them.



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...