Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
123456aA
User Rank
Author
Re: Java Baggage and Security?
123456aA   2/24/2014 5:39:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Oracle is making progress in IoT

I've just found nice white paper http://www.m2mnow.biz/analyst-whitepaper-unlocking-business-value-leveraging-java-on-devices/?entrysource=subar 

I think they need developers and project managers support now...

 

p123a
User Rank
Author
SMT module for Java and IoT
p123a   9/28/2013 12:48:23 PM
NO RATINGS
A descendandt to TINI (Java module) can be seen in EET Europerecently published (link below)

http://www.electronics-eetimes.com/en/smt-network-application-platform-measures-only-25.4x31.9x2mm.html?cmp_id=7&news_id=222917999#

Note: The Dallas TINI was a popular reference module, it was not intended to be used in produtcs according to tales but was used in probably hundred or thousands of products.

 

 

kfield
User Rank
Author
Hear from engineers
kfield   9/27/2013 3:56:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd like to hear from embedded developers who are successfully using Java in an application today.

halherta
User Rank
Author
Re: Anyone remember the TINI Java SIMM
halherta   9/25/2013 2:20:16 PM
NO RATINGS
@Tonytib, thanks for the links to elua and LuaJIT..I'll check them out! But concerning Java in the embedded space & in particular in non-MMU microcontrollers:

I'm a big fan of any new programming language that makes development easier but at what cost ?

Let's assume that I can develop an Embedded Project in C on a $1 Cortex-m0+ microcontroller with 64KB Flash and 8KB of RAM. Developing the same project in Java is likely to require a Cortex-M3/M4 clocked at twice the speed and with 5-10 times the memory footprint; increasing the overall cost of the microcontroller to $4-5;not to mention increase power requirements. Furthermore the more powerful micro may require additional supporting circuitry which will further increase cost per unit .

Are these significant increases in cost per unit and reduction in power efficiency worth the easier development & time to market advantage that comes with using Java? Maybe it is in some cases but definitely not in all cases.

Not to mention that I've yet to see free Java dev tools for microcontrollers....Free & open-source  C/C++ dev tools for microcontrollers have been around for a long time.

TonyTib
User Rank
Author
Re: Anyone remember the TINI Java SIMM
TonyTib   9/25/2013 12:10:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Yup, I still have 2 TINI's hiding somewhere. Some Java-oriented MCUs and SOMs are still available, although the similar systems running .NET MicroFramework appear to be more popular, at least in the hobby/maker world.

If you're going the full-blown MPU route, Android is another attractive option if you're going to be using a touch screen.

If you're looking for a dynamic, compact language, there's eLua (can fit in 64K SRAM, 256K flash) and LuaJIT (which is much faster than Python), both of which play well with C.

halherta
User Rank
Author
Anyone remember the TINI Java SIMM
halherta   9/25/2013 11:01:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Many attempts at using Java in the embedded space have been made. Two that come to mind are the TINI Java Simms (late 90s) and the Javelin Stamp. Yet Java has thus far failed to grab significant market share in the embedded space due to its largely memory footprint and slower speed. With microcontrollers becoming more powerful and embedd more memory, this will become less of a problem.

Furthermore with the advent of the low cost Microprocessors such as the Raspberry Pi's BCM2835 & Ti's Sitara Cortex-A8s, one could easily use full blown Linux in their embedded projects. With Linux, not only  can you use Java to implement your next embedded project, you could use Perl, Python, Basic, Bash, Pascal, Fortran & even Cobol!

Personally I prefer using C/C++ for microcontrollers. On Microprocessors running Linux, a combination of C/C++ & Linux system programming libraries & QT5 enables me to do pretty much all that I need, to get my next internet of things project going.

 

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
Re: Java Baggage and Security?
Sanjib.A   9/24/2013 11:42:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Henrik,

Thanks for the information. I have a few questions and sorry that I could not go through the information you have provided..,I will go through taking some time,

The Java ME Embedded version that you have mentioned here is not a RTOS...right? Is there any plan for a RTOS and if yes, by when?

Good to see that Java ME Embedded needs 192KB RAM and 1MB ROM as we get some high=end microcontrollers now a days with sufficiently enough internal memory, but I guess for a RTOS the memory requirement should be much lower than this. Any plans?

Best Regards,

Sanjib

TonyTib
User Rank
Author
Re: Java Baggage and Security?
TonyTib   9/24/2013 11:53:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, ST has been supporting Java for a while: http://www.stm32java.com/portal/


On the desktop, Java and .NET are roughly comparable (and are good frameworks overall).  One of the best features of both is the ability to use different languages (such as Scala, Groovy, and F#) that target the runtime and can interop with Java/C#/etc code -- but I doubt that ability will make it to J2ME or the .NET Micro Framework (used in the Gadgeteer and Netduinos).

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Re: Java Baggage and Security?
DrFPGA   9/24/2013 11:52:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanx for the info. 1MB ROM is still very big 9in my book). Any way you can get it down to 256KB or below? A feature 'slim' version perhaps? For many high volume apps the 1MB size can be just too costly...

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
Re: Java Baggage and Security?
elctrnx_lyf   9/24/2013 11:03:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Does java is going to really simplify the product software development effort?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...