Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 400 Gb/s
rick merritt   9/26/2013 9:37:41 AM
NO RATINGS
I have asked Cisco to chime in with answersw to the questions below. Hopefully they will soon.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 400 Gb/s
rick merritt   9/25/2013 6:54:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@ajaycmj and lowinger42: Thanks for your perspective!

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: 400 Gb/s
krisi   9/25/2013 5:45:25 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you @ajaycm...I understand this ASIC does deep level packet processing, it is not a switch...still there are other packet processing ASICs out there, how is Cisco ASIC tsacking against them? Kris

ajaycm
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 400 Gb/s
ajaycm   9/25/2013 5:15:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I think this is a big deal. They have designed in the TM, QM funcionality into what was traditionally the NPU (packet processor). Previously, interface asics would stamp packets with preanalysis headers and send them to iTM (ingress traffic mgr) and from there it went to the NPU and or replicator engine for multicast. The amount of real estate on board was huge and it seems like they have significantly reduced the board real estate. That would allow them to put multiple such packet processing "pipelines". Seems this is huge for integration.

Knowing Cisco asics, I would not doubt that the operations in TM/QM/PP are probably as complete as you can imagine. What would be interesting is understanding the the number of queues they support for their TMs and some other TM details.

The folks who find this underwhelming probably don't understand what is going on here. This is not Z80s and LAN Controllers!

lowinger42
User Rank
Rookie
400 Gbps
lowinger42   9/25/2013 11:53:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Just comparing bandwidth is not telling us that much.

What can be done to each packet at 400 Gbps/300 Mpps? That is much more interesting to compare. Number of SRAM/DRAM/TCAM lookups, what type of QoS, number of queues, type and number of schedulers etc.

And the comment that 300 Mbpps it too low. I see very little reason to design for linerate 64 byte packets. That does not exist in the real word... It can be done but it will negatively affect what can be done for each packet... 

krisi
User Rank
CEO
400 Gb/s
krisi   9/24/2013 5:09:52 PM
NO RATINGS
400 Gb/s aggregate throughput is hardly impressive...more powerful ASIC have been designed few years back

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Router ASIC wars
rick merritt   9/24/2013 1:39:52 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems like Cisco may not be so far ahead of AlcaLu, Huawei etc. this time around. What do you think?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Where Are the Ceramic Vacuum Tube Holders of Yesteryear?
Max Maxfield
49 comments
I'm currently cursing myself for being a fool. I have let chances and opportunities slip between my fingers. I deserve to be berated soundly. But what is the cause of this gnashing of ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...