Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cool idea!
R_Colin_Johnson   10/3/2013 9:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
@ Skyye " Is hacking implanted medical device a serious issue in the States?"

So far most of the hacking has been done by engineers trying to prove that it is possible, so that the companies making the implants will be forced to provide security before it becomes a problem. Many security techniques have been proposed, which prompts engineers to by to crack those protection schemes--just to prove that they are crackable However, I don't know of any serious incidents of malicious hacking of an implant inside a person to harm that individual.

 

Skyye
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Cool idea!
Skyye   10/3/2013 9:29:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello everyone, please excuse me to interrupt the middle of the conversation. I am Debby, a student studying in journalism from Taiwan. I wold like to write an article about this, due to the lack of medical background, I want to ask:  Is hacking implanted medical device a serious issue in the State? 



rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Re:
rick merritt   9/26/2013 9:44:46 AM
NO RATINGS
@Prabhakar: I don't know how realistic your hijack scenario is, but it would make a grreat scene in a thriller novel!

p_g
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Just Say No
p_g   9/26/2013 1:27:30 AM
NO RATINGS
By going wireless all we are trying to do is prevent another minor surgery to operate device, and easing out reprograming. Touching doesn't defeat the purpose of wireless in medical equipment. I dont think we can consider it as step back.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Just Say No
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 6:30:57 PM
NO RATINGS
You make a good point. The implant industry is increasingly going wireless, so in that sense requiring touch for 12 seconds in order to establish a secure connection is a bit of a step back, although in the doctor's office it probably would not be much of an inconvenience.

Some Guy
User Rank
CEO
Just Say No
Some Guy   9/25/2013 6:03:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Just because there is an Internet of Things doesn't mean that my medical device has to be on it. There are plenty of non-contact options that obviate this kind of attack. If you are requiring that an authorized reader be in touch contact with the patient, why one of those? WiFi, Wi-Max and Bluetooth aren't the only things out there.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cool idea!
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 2:17:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Your're right. And as more and more get implants, the temptation  to hackers will increase.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cool idea!
Caleb Kraft   9/25/2013 2:02:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Hacking a pacemaker is something that has been researched and proven to be possible. The problem is though, it is a lot of effort when a good EMP would do the job just as well. there just isn't much benefit to hacking them.

That doesn't mean people won't do it though!

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re:
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 12:14:09 PM
NO RATINGS
prabhakar_deosthali re: "I am just imagining a scenario where the hacker hijacks a high profile person"

The hacker would have to be touching the person with an ECG probe for 12 seconds to successfully "hijack" the random number and then negociate a secure wireless connection--which doesn't seem long, but if you count it down on a clock seems much longer. Nevertheless, I do see your point that some scenario could make that possible. 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cool idea!
junko.yoshida   9/25/2013 8:41:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, this seems like a cool idea...but as we all know too well, most device makers won't do much about the so-called security (even though they should), until some truly traumatic and tragic accidents happen. 

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)