Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
R_Colin_Johnson   10/3/2013 9:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
@ Skyye " Is hacking implanted medical device a serious issue in the States?"

So far most of the hacking has been done by engineers trying to prove that it is possible, so that the companies making the implants will be forced to provide security before it becomes a problem. Many security techniques have been proposed, which prompts engineers to by to crack those protection schemes--just to prove that they are crackable However, I don't know of any serious incidents of malicious hacking of an implant inside a person to harm that individual.

 

Skyye
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
Skyye   10/3/2013 9:29:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello everyone, please excuse me to interrupt the middle of the conversation. I am Debby, a student studying in journalism from Taiwan. I wold like to write an article about this, due to the lack of medical background, I want to ask:  Is hacking implanted medical device a serious issue in the State? 



rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re:
rick merritt   9/26/2013 9:44:46 AM
NO RATINGS
@Prabhakar: I don't know how realistic your hijack scenario is, but it would make a grreat scene in a thriller novel!

p_g
User Rank
Author
Re: Just Say No
p_g   9/26/2013 1:27:30 AM
NO RATINGS
By going wireless all we are trying to do is prevent another minor surgery to operate device, and easing out reprograming. Touching doesn't defeat the purpose of wireless in medical equipment. I dont think we can consider it as step back.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Just Say No
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 6:30:57 PM
NO RATINGS
You make a good point. The implant industry is increasingly going wireless, so in that sense requiring touch for 12 seconds in order to establish a secure connection is a bit of a step back, although in the doctor's office it probably would not be much of an inconvenience.

Some Guy
User Rank
Author
Just Say No
Some Guy   9/25/2013 6:03:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Just because there is an Internet of Things doesn't mean that my medical device has to be on it. There are plenty of non-contact options that obviate this kind of attack. If you are requiring that an authorized reader be in touch contact with the patient, why one of those? WiFi, Wi-Max and Bluetooth aren't the only things out there.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 2:17:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Your're right. And as more and more get implants, the temptation  to hackers will increase.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
Caleb Kraft   9/25/2013 2:02:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Hacking a pacemaker is something that has been researched and proven to be possible. The problem is though, it is a lot of effort when a good EMP would do the job just as well. there just isn't much benefit to hacking them.

That doesn't mean people won't do it though!

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re:
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 12:14:09 PM
NO RATINGS
prabhakar_deosthali re: "I am just imagining a scenario where the hacker hijacks a high profile person"

The hacker would have to be touching the person with an ECG probe for 12 seconds to successfully "hijack" the random number and then negociate a secure wireless connection--which doesn't seem long, but if you count it down on a clock seems much longer. Nevertheless, I do see your point that some scenario could make that possible. 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
junko.yoshida   9/25/2013 8:41:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, this seems like a cool idea...but as we all know too well, most device makers won't do much about the so-called security (even though they should), until some truly traumatic and tragic accidents happen. 

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
HankWalker
 
Max The Magnificent
 
dt_hayden
 
briand66
 
Ron Neale
 
resistion
 
realjjj
 
andre212
 
Ron Neale
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...