Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
R_Colin_Johnson   10/3/2013 9:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
@ Skyye " Is hacking implanted medical device a serious issue in the States?"

So far most of the hacking has been done by engineers trying to prove that it is possible, so that the companies making the implants will be forced to provide security before it becomes a problem. Many security techniques have been proposed, which prompts engineers to by to crack those protection schemes--just to prove that they are crackable However, I don't know of any serious incidents of malicious hacking of an implant inside a person to harm that individual.

 

Skyye
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
Skyye   10/3/2013 9:29:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello everyone, please excuse me to interrupt the middle of the conversation. I am Debby, a student studying in journalism from Taiwan. I wold like to write an article about this, due to the lack of medical background, I want to ask:  Is hacking implanted medical device a serious issue in the State? 



rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re:
rick merritt   9/26/2013 9:44:46 AM
NO RATINGS
@Prabhakar: I don't know how realistic your hijack scenario is, but it would make a grreat scene in a thriller novel!

p_g
User Rank
Author
Re: Just Say No
p_g   9/26/2013 1:27:30 AM
NO RATINGS
By going wireless all we are trying to do is prevent another minor surgery to operate device, and easing out reprograming. Touching doesn't defeat the purpose of wireless in medical equipment. I dont think we can consider it as step back.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Just Say No
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 6:30:57 PM
NO RATINGS
You make a good point. The implant industry is increasingly going wireless, so in that sense requiring touch for 12 seconds in order to establish a secure connection is a bit of a step back, although in the doctor's office it probably would not be much of an inconvenience.

Some Guy
User Rank
Author
Just Say No
Some Guy   9/25/2013 6:03:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Just because there is an Internet of Things doesn't mean that my medical device has to be on it. There are plenty of non-contact options that obviate this kind of attack. If you are requiring that an authorized reader be in touch contact with the patient, why one of those? WiFi, Wi-Max and Bluetooth aren't the only things out there.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 2:17:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Your're right. And as more and more get implants, the temptation  to hackers will increase.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
Caleb Kraft   9/25/2013 2:02:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Hacking a pacemaker is something that has been researched and proven to be possible. The problem is though, it is a lot of effort when a good EMP would do the job just as well. there just isn't much benefit to hacking them.

That doesn't mean people won't do it though!

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re:
R_Colin_Johnson   9/25/2013 12:14:09 PM
NO RATINGS
prabhakar_deosthali re: "I am just imagining a scenario where the hacker hijacks a high profile person"

The hacker would have to be touching the person with an ECG probe for 12 seconds to successfully "hijack" the random number and then negociate a secure wireless connection--which doesn't seem long, but if you count it down on a clock seems much longer. Nevertheless, I do see your point that some scenario could make that possible. 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool idea!
junko.yoshida   9/25/2013 8:41:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, this seems like a cool idea...but as we all know too well, most device makers won't do much about the so-called security (even though they should), until some truly traumatic and tragic accidents happen. 

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
cd2012
 
junko.yoshida
 
MikeD95101
 
betajet
 
junko.yoshida
 
Bill_Higdon
 
Tom_C
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
David Ashton
Most Recent Messages
5/27/2015
9:18:32 PM
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Overview: Battle-hardened veterans of the electronics industry have heard of the “connected car” so often that they assume it’s a done deal. But do we really know what it takes to get a car connected and what its future entails? Join EE Times editor Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of movers and shakers in the connected car business. Executives from Cisco, Siemens and NXP will share ideas, plans and hopes for connected cars and their future. After the first 30 minutes of the radio show, our listeners will have the opportunity to ask questions via live online chat.
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...