Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Steve.Picotest
User Rank
Author
Re: When to use averaging
Steve.Picotest   9/26/2013 1:59:49 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
This is a great question, though not a particularly simple one.  Some applications that would seem obvious to use averaging can be problematic, for example looking at the switch node in a power supply or a step load would seem like a suitable time to use averaging, but in many cases this isn't so. Another example is the step load of a POL, which often has large signal effects, so each cycle can be different than the one before or after it.  The switch node often has jitter in switching frequency and/or pulse width as well as amplitude modulation.  These artifacts would all be averaged distorting the the result or failing to let you see them. 

 

One time that you would want to use averaging  is to isolate a signal that is mixed with other signals.  Say you want to isolate the switching ripple from load induced noise (such as a step load).  If the scope is triggered on the switching frequency averaging will keep the switching ripple result and average out all other signals so long as the other signals are not synchronized to the switching frequency.

One way to tell if averaging is resaonable is to switch on persistance mode.  If the resulting waveform envelope is very small averaging is probably ok, but if the envelope is significant don't use averaging. 

If there is any doubt, skip the averaging.

The impact of averaging on the measurement can be substantial and a picture is worth a thousand words, so maybe I will do a blog on the subject. to appear after part 4 of this one.

 

Thanks for the great question.

 

Steve

 

Steve.Picotest
User Rank
Author
Re: When to use averaging
Steve.Picotest   9/26/2013 1:59:46 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
This is a great question, though not a particularly simple one.  Some applications that would seem obvious to use averaging can be problematic, for example looking at the switch node in a power supply or a step load would seem like a suitable time to use averaging, but in many cases this isn't so. Another example is the step load of a POL, which often has large signal effects, so each cycle can be different than the one before or after it.  The switch node often has jitter in switching frequency and/or pulse width as well as amplitude modulation.  These artifacts would all be averaged distorting the the result or failing to let you see them. 

 

One time that you would want to use averaging  is to isolate a signal that is mixed with other signals.  Say you want to isolate the switching ripple from load induced noise (such as a step load).  If the scope is triggered on the switching frequency averaging will keep the switching ripple result and average out all other signals so long as the other signals are not synchronized to the switching frequency.

One way to tell if averaging is resaonable is to switch on persistance mode.  If the resulting waveform envelope is very small averaging is probably ok, but if the envelope is significant don't use averaging. 

If there is any doubt, skip the averaging.

The impact of averaging on the measurement can be substantial and a picture is worth a thousand words, so maybe I will do a blog on the subject. to appear after part 4 of this one.

 

Thanks for the great question.

 

Steve

 

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
When to use averaging
MeasurementBlues   9/26/2013 8:01:00 AM
NO RATINGS
>The averaging function is useful in cases where the measurement is very consistent and the noise you wish to eliminate is not time correlated with the measurement.

Steve, can you give an example of when to use avaraging?



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
VicVat
 
jnissen
 
M_Alex_Nugent
 
traneus
 
David Ashton
 
perl_geek
 
Max The Magnificent
 
perl_geek
 
perl_geek
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...