Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>
krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: why so closed?
krisi   9/27/2013 1:16:54 PM
I don't agree Prabhakar...in the long run perhaps...but for now there is no entity, corporation or government that could shell out billions of dollars needed to build the infrastructure so it needs to be done one driver at the time...Kris

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
Re: why so closed?
prabhakar_deosthali   9/27/2013 1:02:41 PM
NO RATINGS
@Junko,

In my opinion the additional money a car owner will have to pay for such driver assistance features installed and to be maintained  in a car will be much higher than the expenditure to install a common driver assistance infrastruture.

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: why so closed?
junko.yoshida   9/27/2013 12:53:00 PM
NO RATINGS
No, Caleb, it is NOT a fantasy. What you just described is a part of the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure scheme. 

But of course, there is always this pesky little issue of who is going to pay for that infrastructure.

Meanwhile, carmakers are moving on, trying to address the safety issue via arming their cars with sensors -- radar and vision both.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
Re: why so closed?
prabhakar_deosthali   9/27/2013 12:52:24 PM
NO RATINGS
I also agree with the idea that the emphasis should be , putting whatever technology ( Vision /Radar)  into the road infrastructure rather than on every car. That will improve the reliability of the whole system because the infrastructure management can be done with much more efficiency than the individual cars. The problems of dirt/uneven painting of lanes can be circumvented by redundant sensors in the infrastructure.

And as @Caleb Craft is saying, the infrastructure can show a driver the "big picture"

chanj0
User Rank
Author
Liability
chanj0   9/27/2013 12:39:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Vision technology has advanced enough to reliability detect lanes and to identify objects in front. Challenge is if the paint to separate lanes are consistently there.

I agree with the assessment. I do believe driver assistance shall be an hybrid of both vision and radar simply because measuring distance is not quite reliable using vision based system. Rather, radar is doing a good job.

With the ADAS, who's responsible to an accident in case it happens? ADAS can be giving out warning signal. The liability becomes obvious. The challenge is when ADAS is actually doing part of the job.

 

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
why so closed?
Caleb Kraft   9/27/2013 12:05:05 PM
I know this is jumping way off topic, but I can imagine that ideally the sensors your car would be using wouldn't necessarily be mounted ON the car. Once we could have the infrastructure updated it could be pulling from aerial cameras and other stationary devices that see the big picture. A pileup a mile in the distance could be registered and compensated for long before your bumper mounted radar could do anything.

I know it is just a fantasy, but just imagine if we could implement control systems like this one that controlls these quadcopters into our roadways!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiCFtmdrvHM

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Vision Systems Are Software-Defined Sensors
junko.yoshida   9/27/2013 11:53:07 AM
NO RATINGS
@JeffBier, thanks for the URL! Thinking of a vision system as a "software-defined sensor" is an intriguing idea. As more intelligence and smarts is getting integrated into the vision system, that seems to be the trend...

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: It's not either-or
junko.yoshida   9/27/2013 11:34:25 AM
NO RATINGS
@JeffBier, I totally agree!

In fact, I do understand that this is not an either or question. And yet, in talking about this with several participants at the conference here, I realized that there are many different shades of radars and vision technologies.

Carmakers can choose to use vision sensors integrated with more smarts and intelligence while adopting a lighter version of radar system. Or, they can pay more for the heavier- duty radar system and add a much more straightforward image sensor (sans too much intelligence). There seems to be a growing options for carmakers. 

 

 

JeffBier
User Rank
Author
Vision Systems Are Software-Defined Sensors
JeffBier   9/27/2013 11:28:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Another factor in favor of using vision in these applications is that a vision system can be thought of as a "software-defined sensor", which can be adapted to mulitple purposes.  For example, Mercedes is using a camera and embedded vision system to scan the road surface and adjust the car's suspension in real time for each bump in the road, resulting in a dramatic improvement in ride comfort.  See http://bit.ly/LUvH42 for a review of this technology.

For those who want to learn how such systems are built, there are still a few seats available at the Embedded Vision Summit on October 2nd in the Boston area, where we'll have a full day of presentations and demos on embedded vision applications, algorithms, design techniques, and technology.  See http://bit.ly/1d3xTrK for details.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
compressed or uncompressed?
junko.yoshida   9/27/2013 11:28:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Oh, ST's Duncan also helped solve a mystery about whether video streams captured by cameras equipped in cars are compressed. 

The 360 surround view IS compressed, and as one of the EE Times readers commented in earlier posts, it is using Motion JPEG.

However, as to the video images caturred by a frontal camera is NOT compressed, according to Duncan. 

<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...