Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
jackOfManyTrades   10/2/2013 3:10:11 AM
I guess it would. I don't know why DOCSIS 3.1 uses OFDM. DVB-C2 does, too. It may be that it's six of one and half-a-dozen of the a other and as a lot of other systems use OFDM these days, it's easier to design a similar system. eg DVB-T2 (and T) uses OFDM; DVB-C is single carrier, but DVB-C2 is OFDM and very similar to DVB-T2. It makes designing a chip to do both easier and cheaper.

User Rank
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
Bert22306   10/1/2013 3:31:58 PM
Yes, that would make sense. In which case, though, the same would apply to using LDPC FEC with single-carrier QAM.

User Rank
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
jackOfManyTrades   10/1/2013 3:23:50 AM
I think the key phrase is "and other coding techniques". DOCSIS 3.1 uses an LDPC FEC, which makes it possible to use 4096-QAM. There's your 50% increase in capacity.

User Rank
This needs to be explained rather than just stated
Bert22306   9/27/2013 4:36:29 PM
"The addition of OFDM modulation and other coding techniques results in a 50 percent increase in throughput versus QAM channels across an equivalent bandwidth."

Is this only because the guard bands between 6 MHz channels can be slightly narrower?

Use of OFDM is only really called for in environments with a lot of multipath interference. Are they having multipath problems in cable systems? Otherwise, a single carrier scheme like QAM should give measurably lower levels of threshold SNR, so I don't see this unqualified statement that OFDM is desirable in cable systems as a slam dunk. Sounds like another tradeoff that needs to be mentioned, at least in passing.

User Rank
Upstream vs. downstream
LarryM99   9/27/2013 3:18:00 PM
Jim, it looks like there is a significant increase in upstream bandwidth and a smaller increase in downstream. Am I reading that correctly? Does that indicate a departure from the assumption that most traffic goes to the cable customers instead of from them?

IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.