Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
jackOfManyTrades   10/2/2013 3:10:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess it would. I don't know why DOCSIS 3.1 uses OFDM. DVB-C2 does, too. It may be that it's six of one and half-a-dozen of the a other and as a lot of other systems use OFDM these days, it's easier to design a similar system. eg DVB-T2 (and T) uses OFDM; DVB-C is single carrier, but DVB-C2 is OFDM and very similar to DVB-T2. It makes designing a chip to do both easier and cheaper.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
Bert22306   10/1/2013 3:31:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that would make sense. In which case, though, the same would apply to using LDPC FEC with single-carrier QAM.

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
jackOfManyTrades   10/1/2013 3:23:50 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the key phrase is "and other coding techniques". DOCSIS 3.1 uses an LDPC FEC, which makes it possible to use 4096-QAM. There's your 50% increase in capacity.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
This needs to be explained rather than just stated
Bert22306   9/27/2013 4:36:29 PM
NO RATINGS
"The addition of OFDM modulation and other coding techniques results in a 50 percent increase in throughput versus QAM channels across an equivalent bandwidth."

Is this only because the guard bands between 6 MHz channels can be slightly narrower?

Use of OFDM is only really called for in environments with a lot of multipath interference. Are they having multipath problems in cable systems? Otherwise, a single carrier scheme like QAM should give measurably lower levels of threshold SNR, so I don't see this unqualified statement that OFDM is desirable in cable systems as a slam dunk. Sounds like another tradeoff that needs to be mentioned, at least in passing.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Upstream vs. downstream
LarryM99   9/27/2013 3:18:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Jim, it looks like there is a significant increase in upstream bandwidth and a smaller increase in downstream. Am I reading that correctly? Does that indicate a departure from the assumption that most traffic goes to the cable customers instead of from them?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).