Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
jackOfManyTrades   10/2/2013 3:10:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess it would. I don't know why DOCSIS 3.1 uses OFDM. DVB-C2 does, too. It may be that it's six of one and half-a-dozen of the a other and as a lot of other systems use OFDM these days, it's easier to design a similar system. eg DVB-T2 (and T) uses OFDM; DVB-C is single carrier, but DVB-C2 is OFDM and very similar to DVB-T2. It makes designing a chip to do both easier and cheaper.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
Bert22306   10/1/2013 3:31:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that would make sense. In which case, though, the same would apply to using LDPC FEC with single-carrier QAM.

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
Re: This needs to be explained rather than just stated
jackOfManyTrades   10/1/2013 3:23:50 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the key phrase is "and other coding techniques". DOCSIS 3.1 uses an LDPC FEC, which makes it possible to use 4096-QAM. There's your 50% increase in capacity.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
This needs to be explained rather than just stated
Bert22306   9/27/2013 4:36:29 PM
NO RATINGS
"The addition of OFDM modulation and other coding techniques results in a 50 percent increase in throughput versus QAM channels across an equivalent bandwidth."

Is this only because the guard bands between 6 MHz channels can be slightly narrower?

Use of OFDM is only really called for in environments with a lot of multipath interference. Are they having multipath problems in cable systems? Otherwise, a single carrier scheme like QAM should give measurably lower levels of threshold SNR, so I don't see this unqualified statement that OFDM is desirable in cable systems as a slam dunk. Sounds like another tradeoff that needs to be mentioned, at least in passing.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Upstream vs. downstream
LarryM99   9/27/2013 3:18:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Jim, it looks like there is a significant increase in upstream bandwidth and a smaller increase in downstream. Am I reading that correctly? Does that indicate a departure from the assumption that most traffic goes to the cable customers instead of from them?



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
4 comments
An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely unfamiliar. ...

Max Maxfield

What's the Best Traveling Toolkit?
Max Maxfield
23 comments
A few years ago at a family Christmas party, I won a pocket knife as part of a "Dirty Santa" game. This little scamp was a Buck 730 X-Tract. In addition to an incredibly strong and sharp ...

Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
10 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
42 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)