Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
Co-Design ensures the success of development
Kinnar   9/29/2013 2:27:54 PM
It is quite right that Co-Design will decrease the chances of delay in the system design, generally the traditional design was incorporating the hardware design first and later at the time of designing the software many points of modifying the hardware were getting raised, this approach minimized these chances.

User Rank
Re: ?
guy_bois   9/29/2013 12:10:29 PM
Dear KB3001, EDA evolution contains many examples where the introduction of new technologies, to further automate the design process, met with reticence and resistance before their adoption. For example, RTL languages and logic synthesis when they emerged in the 1990s, but are now in routine use. For ESL and codesign, the challenge is even greater because it does not only involve hardware designers, but also software developers. We are not saying that software developers will replace hardware designers (or vice versa). Anyone who has worked with HLS tools knows that it takes knowledge and experience in hardware to obtain efficient results. Once you know how use it, HLS saves a lot of time and allows one to focus on the algorithm optimization (in collaboration with software developers) rather than on details of state machines. For that, we say that a common langage and platform must be at a higher level of abstraction than RTL, allowing us to bring together "groups of developers with complementary skills"...

User Rank
Re: ?
guy_bois   9/29/2013 12:02:22 PM
Thanks for your input, j_b_ This isn't just musing on paper, we are doing this today with system level (ESL) models in C/C++ with SystemC and TLM-2.0.  By working in a common language, this is not just for system architects but  allows system architects to work with software developers and hardware designers.  So the sort of specialist insight that you talk about, and new perspectives that they can gain from each other, can help to drive design exploration and achieving an optimal design.  The technology does not optimize the design (yet), it merely eases the process by retargeting the same function (within an application) to either hardware or software implementation.

User Rank
Re: ?
KB3001   9/29/2013 6:31:32 AM
My experience has been the same. Instead of expecting one person to be expert at everything we needs groups of developers with complementary skills who can understand each other's requirements and can work well together in an agile way.


PS. High level tools are good after the bootom-up work has been done properly.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Re: ?
Robotics Developer   9/28/2013 6:35:50 PM
I second the encouragement of software engineers who understand hardware and hardware engineers who understand software!  All too often I have seen software talent being used to design hardware (usually FPGAs due to the "programming nature" of the VHDL/Verilog) who did not understand any of the hardware nor the implications of their "code".  Over time, they learned from their mistakes and migrated towards a software like understanding of hardware and given enough experience would be quite adapt at the development of hardware.  The biggest bang for the buck would be to more tightly integrate the software/hardware developers so that just like Agile software team approach everyone is responsible for jumping in and making the next release (hardware prototype) successful.

User Rank
j_b_   9/27/2013 5:49:15 PM
In my opinion that's something that sounds great on paper but might very well fail in practice. I would rather prefer hardware developers that can program and programmers that understand hardware. Together they'll do the proper dove-tailing much better than such an abstraction monster - while using the correct tools for both sides of the development. At least that's my experience over the last 25 years in this business. It's like the thing with automatic routing of PCBs with all the constraints etc. The theory sounds great, but the results of human professionals are still better than what the machine turns out.



As we unveil EE Times’ 2015 Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. Panelists Dan Armbrust (investment firm Silicon Catalyst), Andrew Kau (venture capital firm Walden International), and Stan Boland (successful serial entrepreneur, former CEO of Neul, Icera) join in the live debate.
Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...