Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
To ARMs!
DrFPGA   10/15/2013 11:59:31 AM
NO RATINGS
One more indication that ARM has won the architecture war. And it isn't even about the hardware.

ARM is a ho-hum hardware architecture, but it turns out that isn't really important. It's just good enough so that alternatives with an additional 15% or so efficiency just aren't worth the effort of building an entire architecture infrastructure. Process improvements and software inertia are just too big to fight.

dynamited
User Rank
Author
Re: To ARMs!
dynamited   10/15/2013 3:08:10 PM
NO RATINGS
What are you talking about? ARM has the little wedge on the chart in the article about a design yet to tape out on a vendor (TMSC) that has not demostrated any working logic designs on a 14nm process. You have to put your boots on first before you can win a war.

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Re: To ARMs!
DrFPGA   10/15/2013 3:36:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Yep- this little wedge is just one battle. The war is much bigger and it seems to me that the war will tilt this battle in the favor of ARM. Battles are always difficult to predict, but I'd put my money on the one winning the arms race...

p_g
User Rank
Author
Re: To ARMs!
p_g   10/15/2013 5:57:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree that they are not ready with 14FF yet however they have got good traction and everyone is in same boad with ARM share is swinging in positive direction...

daleste
User Rank
Author
Re: To ARMs!
daleste   10/15/2013 7:28:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I expect ARM to grow in this market.  With Freescale focused on ARM instead of PowerPC, ARM will become the next winner.  I don't expect the X86 to grow.

tb100
User Rank
Author
Won the war?
tb100   10/15/2013 9:59:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Nobody ever 'wins the architecture war' or we'd all be using Intel 4004 processors. You can win a battle for a few years, or if you do really well, for a decade.

Certainly ARM has won the battle, in phones and tablets. But the competitors Intel and MIPS are not standing still:

http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1319799&piddl_msgid=271373#msg_271373

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Won the war?
rick merritt   10/16/2013 4:33:41 AM
NO RATINGS
If you count up the design wins, Intel and ARM have won the next big round. Five years out, who knows?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: To ARMs!
rick merritt   10/16/2013 4:35:31 AM
NO RATINGS
@daleste: Re not expecting Intel to grow: The industry-wide push to SDN is driving a lot of comms apps to x86 servers just as Inte is driving a focus on comms SoCs. I expect them to gain significant ground.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
3 GHz target
rick merritt   10/16/2013 12:41:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I did not mention that Bcom believes the core can hit 3 GHz in 16nm FinFET.

Also, two specific areas in which it is working with ARM and others on network virtualization include:

•  An SoC API for a common view of data plane processing functions and consistent data plane programming model for scalable multi-core performance.

•  Optimization of key features in Linux for IO and accelerator virtualization.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
Re: To ARMs!
Robotics Developer   10/16/2013 8:08:20 PM
NO RATINGS
If the 64bit ARM family comes out strong (good offerings x4 x8 etc.) and with higher processing speeds than have been available (2+ GHz) then I can see ARM winning big.  Last I looked (a few months ago and not real hard) there was just not much real powerful silicon in production.  Now we are hearing about all this 64bit multi-core work, well time will tell, but it looks like a great opportunity for ARM!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...