Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Private Branding
MeasurementBlues   10/24/2013 12:59:39 PM
NO RATINGS
I worked for a company that private brands a lot of test equipment from Asia. It was Taiwan at the time bu now it's China. There are many companies that do the same. The identical multimeter shows up under many brand names.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Private Branding
MeasurementBlues   10/24/2013 9:01:48 AM
NO RATINGS
Here's a link to the piece, from 2006.

Do you care where it comes from?

Unfortunately, the links on that page are broken and are impossible to fix. So many website migrations.

 

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Private Branding
Susan Rambo   10/23/2013 8:57:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting about the rebranding. I guess you always have to ask "what's in a name"--like with an automobile.

I had a friend who lost a hub cap off his minivan at a national park; he knew he lost it and decided to drive around the loop where he lost it until he found the hubcap. Round and round he went looking for hubcaps (there were a lot --- surprisingly many). He finally found one from another manufacturer's minivan that he knew to be exact model of his minivan, except for the rebranded name; he decided that was good enough and took it. His wife finally noticed the replaced hubcap a fews months later.

TonyTib
User Rank
CEO
Private Branding
TonyTib   10/23/2013 2:10:30 PM
NO RATINGS
There's a lot of legitimate private re-branding going on, not just in T&M, but also in my area (industrial automation).  A lot of companies apparently feel they have to be "one stop shops" and don't want to admit they can't do it all.


Also, there's at least some co-development.  To take a recent example I came across, Mitsubishi and Sick sell the same safety PLCs; Phoenix Contact & Leuze also sell the same (but differerent from Mitsu/Sick).  Mitsu & Sick are open about the relationship (it was co-developed, although I suspect Sick was the lead partner).  Phoenix & Leuze aren't; my guess is that it's primarily Leuze (since they make a lot of safety equipment), although there might be Phoenix involvement (Leuze is using Phoenix cases and terminal blocks).

My favorite way is Banner's: they sell a couple models of Lovato safety contactors.  They are open that they're Lovato (they don't even re-brand them) and do it as a service to customers (and it is a service, since those particular models are cheaper from Banner than from Lovato).

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: UI does matter
MeasurementBlues   10/22/2013 9:10:49 PM
NO RATINGS
LarryM99.

Some years ago, a company came out with a line of products and I thought I'd compare the published specs against several competitors. While doing my research, I noticed that one and only one of the competitor's products had identical specs. I noted this in my story, being careful not to accuse the first company of either copying or reselling the products of the competitor. Of course, the company screamed.

My editor asked "is Martin right?" They then agreed that I was in fact right. All I did was compare specs, as anyone interested in buying such a product should do. The company never exactly admitted to private branding, but it was obvious and they got caught. Fortunately, the people at this company had the integrity to drop it there and move on.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: UI does matter
MeasurementBlues   10/22/2013 9:01:55 PM
NO RATINGS
LarryM99, good for you and for Tyler. If you write a fair and accurate review, a good editor will and should back you up. I've been in that situation before and as long as you;re right people should respect that. Unfortunately, not all will. A bad editor would not only leave you out to dry and make an example of you to show everyone else who's the boss.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: UI does matter
Susan Rambo   10/22/2013 9:01:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the entertaining story from my "alma mater" publication. I hadn't heard that one.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
UI does matter
LarryM99   10/22/2013 8:37:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Many years ago I wrote a review of a logic analyzer for Embedded Systems Programming in which I called their user interface archaic. The manufacturer did not like this at all and vented to Tyler Sperry, the Editor of the magazine at the time. Their complaint had all the usual content (we are a major advertiser, the author is biased / stupid, etc.) and how dare you publish a review that says our UI is bad. Tyler responded by asking them "Is it?". Enraged, they did a poll of their users to prove that they were right.

 

They weren't...



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).