Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More to come
junko.yoshida   10/25/2013 2:46:08 PM
NO RATINGS
respectfully, i disagree.

in fact, Toyota settled in this Oklahoma trial. if Toyota thought so strongly that the facts are on their side, I don't think they would have settled, do you?

cookiejar
User Rank
CEO
NASA Found Hardware problem
cookiejar   10/25/2013 2:43:52 PM
NO RATINGS
This article mentions that NASA didn't find a software problem, though there appeared to be one.

The fact remains, NASA did in fact find a hardware problem - whiskers growing  out of the solder joints shorting out the potentiometer sensors used in Toyota's throttle position sensor which had caused unintended acceleration in one vehicle. 

See: http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/readers--choice-2012--jokes-about-engineers--iphone-5--30-years-of-dsps--more/4368865/Toyota-accelerations-revisited-hanging-by-a-tin-whisker 

Whisker growth is quite a common problem with no-lead solder and Toyota, I feel, is negligent in not using a conformal coating or a system fail-safe mode.

Unintended full throttle application can cause a loss of vehicle control when it happens in crucial traffic and road conditions.  If one applies the brakes in the usual fashion, it may feel as if they are not working.  If brakes are pumped in an effort to stop the vehicle, the vacuum supply for the power brakes will be exhausted because its source,  manifold vacuum is zero with the throttle wide open.  Full brakes with no vacuum boost can take a pedal pressure of about 1,000 pounds, quite attainable with one's leg muscles, but not something the average driver would expect. 

Turning off the ignition runs the risk of locking the steering column when done in a panic, but then would still require very high pedal pressure because of lack of vacuum boost.  Throwing the car into neutral isn't exactly instinctive due to a white knuckle panic grip on the wheel.  Throwing the car into neutral might well over-rev the engine and blow it up, while still not giving you vacuum for your power brakes.

If a sudden wide open throttle occurs on the open road, most of us could cope.  If it happens at just the wrong time, in other words by Murphy's law, it's touch and go.  "There but for the grace of God go I."


I for one would certainly not risk buying a Toyota for myself, let alone buy one for a loved one.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More to come
junko.yoshida   10/25/2013 2:43:30 PM
NO RATINGS
They settled as far as the punitive damages are concerned. More on this later. But you won't be disappointed.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More to come
junko.yoshida   10/25/2013 2:42:30 PM
NO RATINGS
wow, talking about being cynical, Rich. the expert winess in this case has a lot of credibility. you will find out more in the story that I will be posting shortly.

rich.pell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More to come
rich.pell   10/25/2013 2:23:46 PM
NO RATINGS
""Probably"? What do you base that on?"

Based on the small likelihood that it was actually proved that an electronic defect caused the acceleration.  And that Toyota has successfully defended itself so far in previous trials.  

"I guess it's okay to be baseless as long as you are dispassionate about it."

Proof has yet to be forthcoming even after extensive study of the issue.  It seems unwarranted to infer from a decision by 12 non-technical jurors on this matter that anything has changed in that regard.  



mixed_signal
User Rank
Rookie
Re: More to come
mixed_signal   10/25/2013 2:23:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, and the transmission should be slammed in to neutral to disengage the engine from the drive train.  Drivers need to know how to handle equipment malfunction.  It's never been required in any licensing test for passenger vehicles that I'm aware of though...

mixed_signal
User Rank
Rookie
put it in neutral
mixed_signal   10/25/2013 2:21:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Drivers that doen't know how to slam the transmission into neutral shouldn't be behind the wheel. Unfortunately there is no mandatory driver training or testing for emergency situation handling.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More to come
Caleb Kraft   10/25/2013 2:01:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Not all modern cars have brake override systems.

http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2013/04/ford-lawsuit.html

without them, slamming on the brakes with full throttle won't necessarily bring you to a swift stop.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More to come
Caleb Kraft   10/25/2013 2:00:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I'll be watching. I'm quite curious about how this one was decided. Was there a brake override system in place?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
Features and Liability
chanj0   10/25/2013 1:36:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Recently, friend of mine buys a car with driver's assist. It applies brake when the vehicle is getting too fast and too close to the car in the front. He's wondering why this feature hasn't been widely adopted years ago since all the necessary sensors are avaiable years back.

To create something requires imagination. To polish something into a product requires more. In automotive industry, reliability and liability are important. If a feature isn't seen as "risk-free", it will not be installed in a vehicle. In addition, the company has to consider how people are operating the vehicle.

Ultronsonic sensors have been used in luxury vehicle more than 15 years ago for parking assist. I am pretty sure automotive companies are looking into applying the technology to elsewhere, for example, driver's assist. What takes the industry so long to adopt it widely?

What if the vehicle with the great feature still hit the car in the front? Who's liable?

Now, will this ruling create a roadblock to the advance of driverless car?

<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
23 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).