Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 11   >   >>
markgoespop
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Interesting reading
markgoespop   10/31/2013 12:43:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm trying to get hold of the court transcript, that is Bookout_v_Toyota_Barr_REDACTED.pdf,but the links I have found so far are dead. Would anyone be able to send me a link, or a copy?

Thanks,

Mark

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Toyota's culpability here is the tip of the iceberg for everyone
Etmax   10/31/2013 10:41:23 AM
NO RATINGS
@JCreasy I agree, proactive recalls are much better than after the fact. I heard from amate that BMW had issues in the US that they didn't want to recall, and Mazda here did something similar. Buyers should vote with their feet, not necessarily for the car with the least problems but rather the best after sales care

JCreasey
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Toyota's culpability here is the tip of the iceberg for everyone
JCreasey   10/31/2013 9:17:38 AM
NO RATINGS
@Etmax. Ah the Doncaster parking lot.

I notice that Nissan have just announced a recall of 152k vehicles for an electronic brake malfunction possibility (http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchResults?searchType=ID&targetCategory=R&searchCriteria.nhtsa_ids=13V445000); this right on top of 900k vehicles with possible acceleration problems (though this was loss of power instead of UA).

At least they are catching the problems before it causes accidents and not after.

 

BBINDER000
User Rank
Rookie
Software hygine isn't a fool's errand
BBINDER000   10/29/2013 3:40:48 PM
NO RATINGS
As a lifelong gear head, I know that worn or broken parts can kill you, but I don't believe claims about unintended acceleration, given functional mechanical pedals, linkages, etc.

I developed a verification and testing process for a firm that developed embedded engine controllers and this all sounds familiar. I'd been dubious about the Toyota failures, but I didn't realize that this car was drive by wire. Buggy software as the root cause of the failure mode is therefore completely plausible, despite no finding of mechanical or electronic failures. 

If Barr's report is accurate, the software design, programming, and testing was ignorant, sloppy, and inadequate. The real shame is that this is completely unnecessary – we've known how to achieve very high reliability software systems for a long time without breaking the bank. Model-based testing is now a big part of that.

I'm not sure who's responsible for the hype and inflammatory language ("a single bit flip could...," task death, dead task, dead app), but I guess that's what you have to do to make software failures tangible to a jury.  It is interesting no smoking gun is reported (recorded input/state with incorrect output that directly caused the failure - i.e., it is not correct to say that a single bit flip caused the failure.)  In a tort case, circumstantial evidence can be sufficient, so it seems that evidence of poor software development alone was enough to convince the jury that it probably caused the failure. 

This may be the first time that indicators of bad code (not actual results) were sufficient to get a judgement. If so, I hope this is a wake up call for people who manage this kind of system development and its risks: software hygine isn't a fool's errand.

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Interesting reading
junko.yoshida   10/29/2013 2:31:23 PM
NO RATINGS
We posted excerpts of the court transcript -- related to "Task X" here:

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1319936&

 

Give you some clues on what Task X was actually tasked to do.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: I admit to a level of cynicism
junko.yoshida   10/29/2013 1:33:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi, Bert. I appreciate a level of skepticism...but let's get too cynical before we know all the facts. 

Actually, I find the fact that the experts' group was able to demonstrate at least one way for the software to cause unintended acceleration is a "breakthrough," at a time when the Toyota case -- up until last week -- was viewed by many as an issue of floor mat, sticky pedal or a driver's error.

 

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Can we get the presentation?
junko.yoshida   10/29/2013 1:26:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes. In the U.S., the court system is open. But it doesn't mean everything used in the trial will be scanned and put up on the Internet. 

We will see how far we can go.

AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Single bit flip
AZskibum   10/29/2013 1:11:50 PM
NO RATINGS
But as Bert and I have pointed out, ultimately the designers of critical safety systems, both hardware & software designers, are dealing with probabilities, and their task is one of reducing the probability of a dangerous incident to some acceptably low level, which can never be exactly zero.

Those familiar with ISO 26262 know that it defines four automotive safety integrity levels (ASILs) and various metrics, including the probability of violation of a safety goal (PVSG). The highest ASIL level, ASIL D, requires a PVSG (1/hour) of less than 10^-8, which is an order of magnitude less than that required by IEC 61508.

An argument could be made that safety systems which meet such requirements reduce the failure rate of these systems to a level far less than the failure rate of human behavior & decision-making while driving. Again, I am speaking of automotive safety in general, without regard to the particulars of this case. We could imagine future standards requiring even lower error probabilities, but these will never be zero.

Consider that just in North America, vehicle travel amounts to about 3 trillion miles a year, amounting to billions of hours spent behind the wheel. That is a sufficiently large sample size that even with extremely low failure probabilities resulting from best engineering practices to ensure absolute safety, failures will still be seen from time to time. But consider how that compares with the injury and fatality rates caused by human error.

Even as modern automotive safety systems make driving safer every year, and as we look toward a future in which we humans are merely passengers in our vehicles and safety incidents are rare, the burden of responsibility and the cost of failure borne by the providers of these systems is far greater than it ever was or is on the fallible humans whose errors cause so many injuries and fatalities every day on our roads.

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Interesting reading
junko.yoshida   10/29/2013 1:07:14 PM
NO RATINGS
I know; that bit was quite interesting, wasn't it?

As I wrote in my blog, http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1319910&, the experts' group spent 18 months in the secluded room in Maryland looking at the source code. Under the unbelievable security.

And in the end, only 12 experts were allowed to see the source code.

The report that contains the source code is NOT made available.

EE Times will be publishing some of the relevant parts of the testimony in a separate story shortly.

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Toyota's culpability here is the tip of the iceberg for everyone
Etmax   10/29/2013 12:58:47 PM
NO RATINGS
@JCreasey :-) re:

At 60mph (88fps) you would maintain a minimum distance of 264ft on a US freeway ...and you'd like to have 528ft? mmm, I'd like to see you do that in peak hour on one of Sydney's or Melbourne's freeways.


I've never been on a Melbourne freeway in peak hour where the speed get much above 60kph let alone 60mph. :-) (you new that was coming right? :-)

Platooning is an interesting one, it would avoid the cycling between 0kph and 60kph that occurs at various intervals on freeways, but as you say with no margin for error, and who is responsible for the collision and possible death? Toyota paid dearly here, and while most drivers can't cope with their car in working order they have little chance to cope with an X-failure in platooning, the car makers will likely be sued out of existence in that case.

People just like to blame someone, and usually the one with the deepest pockets rather than the one at fault.

<<   <   Page 3 / 11   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Aubrey Kagan

Have You Ever Been Blindsided by Your Own Design?
Aubrey Kagan
37 comments
I recently read GCHQ: The uncensored story of Britain's most sensitive intelligence agency by Richard J. Aldrich. The Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ), Britain's equivalent of ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...