Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 5
cd2012
User Rank
Manager
software for self-driving
cd2012   10/31/2013 7:45:46 AM
NO RATINGS
On a tangent, seeing how difficult it is to write flawless software for a ECU, is there any hope of writing good software for a self-driving car, which is an immensely more difficult problem?

 

vasanth kumar d
User Rank
Manager
Re: Is all hope lost?
vasanth kumar d   10/31/2013 1:26:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Is all hope lost?

Yes.

Infact, the right question must be "Do we really need to hope anything?".

Because, even if we could write a perfect firmware that has zero bugs and failures that results in a perfect car, it ceases to be perfect until some other driver lost control of his vehicle and hits us. If so, the best answer, according to me, is to not hope perfection. The only thing we could do is to try writing better firmware that would result in better systems than that was previously.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Is all hope lost?
rick merritt   10/31/2013 12:25:23 AM
NO RATINGS
@Larry: Agreed

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: Is all hope lost?
LarryM99   10/30/2013 8:12:10 PM
NO RATINGS
It is possible to reduce errors to effectively zero, but it is very hard. Complex will always be less reliable than simple, unless that complexity is focused on reliability (for example, overlapped and crosschecked operation of independent systems). The system (hardware and software) has to be independently verified, since developers have blind spots around their own work. The real issue is that it can't be rushed. Making reliability trump schedule would avoid many problems of this type, but especially recently that is a hard case for engineers to make to management.

Frank Eory
User Rank
CEO
Is all hope lost?
Frank Eory   10/30/2013 6:48:34 PM
NO RATINGS
So to summarize, he seems to be saying:

1. Complex software always has bugs, even latent ones that might rarely if ever show up.

2. No matter how imaginative the team is, they will never be able to think of all those bugs. Some bugs and their consequences will simply never occur to the team members.

3. Safety critical systems should follow standards, but even if they do, random events can still activate latent software bugs and take out the fail safe systems designed to protect against those latent bugs.

Is all hope lost?

<<   <   Page 5 / 5


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Aging Brass: Cow Poop vs. Horse Doo-Doo
Max Maxfield
41 comments
As you may recall, one of the things I want to do with the brass panels I'm using in my Inamorata Prognostication Engine is to make them look really old. Since everything is being mounted ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
18 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
12 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)