Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 4   >   >>
KB3001
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
KB3001   10/31/2013 6:24:01 PM
NO RATINGS
One tenth!

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
krisi   10/31/2013 6:09:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank you guys, I finally get it....6LoWPAN sounds fancy but it really is IPv6, just re-packaged for wireless area networks...kind back to my point of IPv6 being sufficient for IoT ;-)...Kris
 


chanj0
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
chanj0   10/31/2013 6:08:14 PM
NO RATINGS
For sensor to send packet to the "gateway", 6LoWPAN, i.e. iP over IEEE802.15.4, makes sense. It saves time on building interconnected infrastructure. Once the packet reaches gateway, the packet will then be decompressed. Ultimatedly, an uncompressed IP packet will be sent to the cloud in whatever mechanism that is defined. For delay tolerant application, I highly suspect the transport layer will stay with TCP. Higher layer can be REST API or SOAP.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
Bert22306   10/31/2013 5:30:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Krisi, this is IPv6 over IEEE 802.15.4, instead of over Ethernet. Read all about it.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6775/?include_text=1

So yes, the comment that IoT would use IP is almost a given. Else, it wouldn't have been called *I*oT.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
Re: Doubt
docdivakar   10/31/2013 5:20:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Bert, I agree with you here with a caveat -perhaps Uncle Sam thinks that it can replicate the success it spawned with ARPANet project leading to the modern-day Internet. Such a premise in this context is largely misguided because IoT has progressed without any government initiatives.

IoT will proliferate because of necessity and not by the 'coolness' factor.

MP Divakar

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
LarryM99   10/31/2013 5:14:38 PM
NO RATINGS
The optimization is actually in the packet size. It is IPv6, but the addressing is shorthanded through the use of a local address table. I believe they also do message compression. The idea is to get the full networking capability of IPv6 without the larger messaging overhead.

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
krisi   10/31/2013 4:49:16 PM
NO RATINGS
thanx...how much smaller is it? TCP/IP packet is not that large

KB3001
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
KB3001   10/31/2013 4:38:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Low power, Krisi. It's lightweight by design: the header, packet size etc. are smaller. It was designed for low power i.e. IoT applications. It makes sense for battery-powered things.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
KB3001   10/31/2013 4:35:36 PM
NO RATINGS
There is COAP for that, Larry.

PS. Yes, 6LoWPAN is a cut-down version of TCP/IP.

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: RF + JTAG?
krisi   10/31/2013 4:30:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Larry, what is the advantage in using 6LOWPAN over plain TCP/IP? I am having hard time understanding why we need a different protocol stack for IoT. TCP/IP is like English lanuage for international talk, sure you can speak some other dialect but why? Kris

<<   <   Page 2 / 4   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
antedeluvian
 
Susan Rambo
 
David Ashton
 
elizabethsimon
 
MeasurementBlues
 
MeasurementBlues
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
Most Recent Messages
2/10/2016
8:49:57 PM
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...