@Crusty: Why not take a leaf out of the radar technology and have a spinning ultrasonic dector turret on the robot. This could be turned by a stepper motor, so you would know where it was pointing relevant to the robots fixed chassis...
That's certainly a possibility -- but in the fullness of time I hope to have my Pixy machine vision sensor mounted on top of the robot ... I'll think about it...
Why not take a leaf out of the radar technology and have a spinning ultrasonic dector turret on the robot. This could be turned by a stepper motor, so you would know where it was pointing relevant to the robots fixed chassis.
It might also look very cool like Robby from the Forbidden Planet ?
What kind of shielding are you planning to use to minimize false positives in your neutrino sensor? ☺
Are you also planning to detect ionizing radiation? Gas leaks? Carbon monoxide? Pollen/particulate count? (With temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure, the robot might be half way to being a mobile weather station--lacking wind speed and direction and precipitation measurement [perhaps also illumination determination--cloudy, partly cloudy, sunny].)
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.