Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
Re: Memory stacks
chipmonk0   2/11/2014 3:26:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Everyone seems to be backing off from putting a stack of memory chips directly on top of a processor ( per the original JEDEC wide I/O spec ) because of yield, logistics, KGD, thermal -- whatever.

But at least by stacking DRAM chips w/ TSVs they are shrinking the distance btwn individual chips on DIMMs and just about eliminating sync-ing / latency due to chip to chip propagation delay.

both Micron HMC and now HBM ( its a JEDEC std. not just SK Hynix ) put the memory stack off the processor but on the same PCB, or substrate / interposer be it organic / Si. So the resut is either 2-d or 2.5-d with the memory in 3-d, not a pure 3-d

Micron's HMC memory chip stack includes a controller logic chip - all vertically connected by Thru Si Vias (TSVs). The stack sits off the CPU and is connected to it by SerDes.

At least right now, its aimed at the high end, FPGAs, Network Controllers that sort of thing

A certain mass market GPU vendor did n't like this configuration ( not willing to pay for the controller chip )

SK Hynix must have heard that complaint.

So their HBM is just a stack of memory ( w/ the controller chip optional ) all hooked up by TSVs, sits off the CPU / GPU, connected to it by parallel I/O with regular drivers ( as it stands now ) with the bandwidth 20 % slower at 128 GBps.

 

krisi
User Rank
Author
0.064mm2 sram cell
krisi   11/5/2013 4:18:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Amazing small cell size...looks like Moore's law still holds

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Memory stacks
rick merritt   11/5/2013 2:02:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I am hungry to hear what folks are doing with Micron and SK Hynix memory cubes/stacks. How is this different from 2.5-D stacks with a processor and memory on an interposer? What are the trade offs?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...