This is a general trends in the industry. Industrials continue to move beyond the old CMOS integration by the integration of new materials. The channel is the only one remaining after changing the gate, the oxide and the contact. (While the channel stressors already make a large improvement)
So this is a natural move and once changed, it will continue to improve at every generation. Starting from Si substrate make it cheap and allows different material integration for NMOS and PMOS.
As usual, the only question is the timing and the first mover. Intel again?
While I can say that this is one of the finest invention and surely can give many advantages to the technology. However I am sure that this can cost much money in order to be fully developed and deployed. - Marla Ahlgrimm
Pretty cool idea but I don't think it will be the key for 10nm? People have been trying to merge high-speed operation of III-V materials with silicon for a long time but it has never happened on a commercial basis, always too expensive with low yeilds...I don't see this is being different but prove me wrong! Kris
It looks like the unit component cost is becoming more expensive. I expect NMOS and PMOS to have different solutions. Like maybe Ge-related for PMOS. On top of added cost for the fins. Yet can't compensate by shrinking extra aggressively either.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.